From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: Reporting bugs and bisection Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:43:29 +0100 Message-ID: <20080414074329.GY9785@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20080413121831.d89dd424.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080413202118.GA29658@2ka.mipt.ru> <200804132233.50491.rjw@sisk.pl> <20080413205406.GA9190@2ka.mipt.ru> <48028830.6020703@earthlink.net> <20080414043939.GA6862@1wt.eu> <20080414053943.GU9785@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20080413232441.e216a02c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080414072328.GW9785@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Willy Tarreau , david@lang.hm, Stephen Clark , Evgeniy Polyakov , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Tilman Schmidt , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Mark Lord , David Miller , jesper.juhl@gmail.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, jeff@garzik.org, linux-kernel , git@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Apr 14 09:45:04 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JlJN4-0002L2-AM for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:44:58 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755926AbYDNHoO (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:44:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755562AbYDNHoN (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:44:13 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:57880 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751866AbYDNHoM (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:44:12 -0400 Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1JlJLe-00075X-1j; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:43:30 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080414072328.GW9785@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 08:23:28AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > And the latter part _must_ be done on each entry point. Any git tree > that acts as injection point really needs a working mechanism of some > sort that would do that; afterwards it's too late, since review of > the stuff getting into mainline on a massive merge is sadly impractical. PS: net/* is actually pretty sane in that respect - the huge volume being what it is, of course, but still, my impression is that it's pretty far from the worst sources of crap. OTOH, I might be missing secondary tree problems - e.g. net/sctp is much worse off in that respect, AFAICT; there might very well be more of such areas.