From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Reporting bugs and bisection Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 05:06:34 -0400 Message-ID: <20080414090634.GB15541@infradead.org> References: <20080413232441.e216a02c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080414072328.GW9785@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20080414010412.c42dc560.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080414.013058.149905948.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, w@1wt.eu, david@lang.hm, sclark46@earthlink.net, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru, rjw@sisk.pl, tilman@imap.cc, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, lkml@rtr.ca, jesper.juhl@gmail.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, jeff@garzik.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, git@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller X-From: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Apr 14 11:08:08 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: linux-netdev-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JlKfW-0000ff-3U for linux-netdev-2@gmane.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:08:06 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751023AbYDNJHV (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 05:07:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750805AbYDNJHT (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 05:07:19 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:39320 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750710AbYDNJHS (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Apr 2008 05:07:18 -0400 Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1JlKe2-0000TN-KK; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:06:34 +0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080414.013058.149905948.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 01:30:58AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > We can ask more subsystem tree maintainers to run their trees more > strictly, review patches more closely, etc. But, be honest, good luck > getting that from the guys who do subsystem maintainence in their > spare time on the weekends. The remaining cases should know better, > or simply don't care. Actually my impression is that spare-time maitainer produce much better code and subsystem trees than corporate-drones. But of course there's a lot of shades between those two extremes.