From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johan Herland Subject: Re: Git on Windows, CRLF issues Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:24:09 +0200 Message-ID: <200804231624.09465.johan@herland.net> References: <20080423081025.GB11935@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , Avery Pennarun , Johannes Schindelin To: Peter Karlsson X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 23 16:26:18 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JofuW-0000bJ-61 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:25:24 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754174AbYDWOYh (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:24:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753962AbYDWOYh (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:24:37 -0400 Received: from sam.opera.com ([213.236.208.81]:47260 "EHLO smtp.opera.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753715AbYDWOYg (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:24:36 -0400 Received: from pc107.coreteam.oslo.opera.com (pat-tdc.opera.com [213.236.208.22]) by smtp.opera.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id m3NEO9Kg021926 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:24:10 GMT User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/6902/Wed Apr 23 09:30:49 2008 on smtp.opera.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wednesday 23 April 2008, Peter Karlsson wrote: > Jeff King: > > Sure, but that is quite slow on a larger tree, since it has to do a > > full checkout for each commit. > > Indeed. That's why I would welcome a script such as the one you > mentioned :-) Fortunately, the repositories I worked on were small > enough to not suffer too much (even when using Git on Windows, which > is a bit slower than on Linux). > > [Not seeing any unreachable objects] > > > Did you remove refs/original/ ? > > That, and cloned the repository to a new location after the > conversion, and removing the references to "origin" there. It does > seem that the objects are still there, but I can't see them with > "gitk --all". Maybe they are kept alive by reflogs? Have fun! :) ...Johan -- Johan Herland, www.herland.net