From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-send-email: add a new sendemail.cc configuration variable Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:51:21 -0400 Message-ID: <20080427235120.GA13948@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1209244746-12649-1-git-send-email-vmiklos@frugalware.org> <20080426232737.GR4012@genesis.frugalware.org> <20080427121458.GU4012@genesis.frugalware.org> <7vprsbf3hz.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080427224255.GD31919@genesis.frugalware.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , Johannes Schindelin To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Apr 28 01:52:07 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JqGf5-0007EX-M5 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:52:04 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758592AbYD0XvQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:51:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752108AbYD0XvQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:51:16 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:1790 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752038AbYD0XvQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:51:16 -0400 Received: (qmail 1009 invoked by uid 111); 27 Apr 2008 23:51:14 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:51:14 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 27 Apr 2008 19:51:21 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080427224255.GD31919@genesis.frugalware.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:42:55AM +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote: > Also, what is the preferred way of the testing method in this case? > Should I just rely on a --dry-run output? Look in t9001; there is a fake sendmail wrapper that outputs the sent messages to files. You can then inspect the files to see that the correct headers were added. -Peff