From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: To page or not to page Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 01:45:09 -0400 Message-ID: <20080502054508.GA28506@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <70F76C0E-E16D-4047-873D-7FD19FDBB55D@sb.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Git Mailing List To: Kevin Ballard X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 02 07:46:01 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jro5n-00020q-BD for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 02 May 2008 07:45:59 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756005AbYEBFpL (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 01:45:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753565AbYEBFpK (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 01:45:10 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:4241 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752592AbYEBFpJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 01:45:09 -0400 Received: (qmail 3499 invoked by uid 111); 2 May 2008 05:45:08 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 May 2008 01:45:08 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 02 May 2008 01:45:09 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <70F76C0E-E16D-4047-873D-7FD19FDBB55D@sb.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 01:41:05AM -0400, Kevin Ballard wrote: > c8af1de9cfa0a5678ae766777e0f905e60b69fda makes git status use a pager. I > think this is a horrible choice. Now when I type `git status` I have to > type "q" to get back to my shell, and I've lost the output of the pager. > It makes sense for commands with long output like `git log`, but `git > status` rarely has output longer than my terminal's height, and so making > it use the pager simply detracts from its functionality. > > Does anybody have any comments or opinions about this either way? I agree with you; I don't like it at all. Probably whether or not to use a pager for a given command should be controlled by a "pager." config variable. In the meantime, try adding FX to your LESS environment variable. -Peff