From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: To page or not to page Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 08:36:56 -0400 Message-ID: <20080502123656.GA2680@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <70F76C0E-E16D-4047-873D-7FD19FDBB55D@sb.org> <20080502054508.GA28506@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vlk2txn8n.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <8C3474E2-3A4F-44E8-B301-C36939C7BA11@sb.org> <807E185B-BEE5-4AAF-8DF4-EE597681D61C@wincent.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Kevin Ballard , Junio C Hamano , Git Mailing List To: Wincent Colaiuta X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 02 14:37:50 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JruWG-0004Ta-Ow for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 02 May 2008 14:37:45 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759390AbYEBMg5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 08:36:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757705AbYEBMg5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 08:36:57 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:2230 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756840AbYEBMg4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 08:36:56 -0400 Received: (qmail 30468 invoked by uid 111); 2 May 2008 12:36:55 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 May 2008 08:36:55 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 02 May 2008 08:36:56 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <807E185B-BEE5-4AAF-8DF4-EE597681D61C@wincent.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 12:34:10PM +0200, Wincent Colaiuta wrote: > But evidently given that there has been so much backlash against the > patch the only way to keep everyone happy will be to make this > configurable. Agreed. But I wonder why there seems to be such a split between people who clearly have short git-status output, and those who have long git-status output. I keep my "untracked files" list tidy. IOW, I always get: $ git status # On branch master nothing to commit (working directory clean) and if I don't, then I should be taking some action to commit things, clean them up, or add them to my .git/info/exclude file. Do other people generally carry around a lot of cruft that "git status" reports? -Peff