From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Teemu Likonen Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/git-gc.txt: change --aggressive description Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 18:03:27 +0300 Message-ID: <20080513150327.GA8077@mithlond.arda.local> References: <1210672413-8761-1-git-send-email-pdebie@ai.rug.nl> <20080513105728.GA3088@mithlond.arda.local> <20080513110842.GB3088@mithlond.arda.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Pieter de Bie , "git@vger.kernel.org" To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 13 17:07:17 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jvw3J-0001Nu-V7 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 13 May 2008 17:04:30 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754551AbYEMPDi (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2008 11:03:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754574AbYEMPDi (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2008 11:03:38 -0400 Received: from mta-out.inet.fi ([195.156.147.13]:34726 "EHLO jenni2.rokki.sonera.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754466AbYEMPDh (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2008 11:03:37 -0400 Received: from mithlond.arda.local (80.220.180.181) by jenni2.rokki.sonera.fi (8.5.014) id 482329DB003C9807; Tue, 13 May 2008 18:03:29 +0300 Received: from dtw by mithlond.arda.local with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Jvw2J-0002MZ-Sf; Tue, 13 May 2008 18:03:27 +0300 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin wrote (2008-05-13 14:53 +0300): > On Tue, 13 May 2008, Teemu Likonen wrote: > > > Teemu Likonen wrote (2008-05-13 13:57 +0300): > > > > > But from ordinary user's point of view this raises questions: if > > > gc --aggressive really is not that aggressive then the option > > > itself is misleading. Why not change gc --aggressive to be really > > > effective? Using high --window/--depth value etc. > > > > I mean, what I'm seeing many places is suggestions to run > > > > git repack -a -d -f --window=100 --depth=100 > > I posted a patch to use 250, not just 100, with --aggressive. See the > mailing list archives for the discussion. Thanks. For easy access I'll paste a link to the discussion. I believe you are referring to this message and thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.devel/94565/focus=67275