From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robin Rosenberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cvsexportcommit: chomp only removes trailing whitespace Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 22:06:53 +0200 Message-ID: <200805142206.53242.robin.rosenberg@dewire.com> References: <7vskwkojhy.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 14 22:10:01 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JwNHc-000770-K6 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 14 May 2008 22:09:05 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758739AbYENUIL (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 16:08:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759209AbYENUIL (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 16:08:11 -0400 Received: from [83.140.172.130] ([83.140.172.130]:15898 "EHLO dewire.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755530AbYENUII (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 May 2008 16:08:08 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dewire.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA4D81434D1B; Wed, 14 May 2008 22:08:04 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at dewire.com Received: from dewire.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (torino.dewire.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hdEoUjfLBMHH; Wed, 14 May 2008 22:08:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.9.0.7] (unknown [10.9.0.7]) by dewire.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F77802809; Wed, 14 May 2008 22:08:02 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > Yes, that is the idea. The point is: there are at least two different > implementations of cvs, and I do not want to rely on a particular one. Does CVSNT add extra spaces? A question arises. Can we use cvs update instead? It can be used to retrieve the latest version (as the -u flag to cvsexportcommit does) and it will tell you what status each affected file has. cvs update -n will just give us the status with unambigous file names. -- robin