From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Riesen Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Implement normalize_absolute_path Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 14:48:54 +0200 Message-ID: <20080522124854.GC3206@steel.home> References: <48327456.1060202@facebook.com> <20080520222447.GA13123@steel.home> <4833DE89.4000106@facebook.com> Reply-To: Alex Riesen Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: David Reiss X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 22 14:49:55 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JzAEy-00056w-EO for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 22 May 2008 14:49:52 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761691AbYEVMs7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2008 08:48:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761097AbYEVMs7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2008 08:48:59 -0400 Received: from mo-p07-ob.rzone.de ([81.169.146.188]:11601 "EHLO mo-p07-ob.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760945AbYEVMs6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2008 08:48:58 -0400 X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo07 X-RZG-AUTH: z4gYkBuibEUndJ36PWMna1s/dNSK Received: from tigra.home (Fa855.f.strato-dslnet.de [195.4.168.85]) by post.webmailer.de (klopstock mo41) (RZmta 16.38) with ESMTP id i027edk4MC3PAI ; Thu, 22 May 2008 14:48:55 +0200 (MEST) (envelope-from: ) Received: from steel.home (steel.home [192.168.1.2]) by tigra.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013E6277BD; Thu, 22 May 2008 14:48:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: by steel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2A29656D28; Thu, 22 May 2008 14:48:55 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4833DE89.4000106@facebook.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: David Reiss, Wed, May 21, 2008 10:34:17 +0200: > This is close enough to what I want that I could definitely use it if it > were in the main tree. I read through most of that thread, but I > couldn't figure out what ever happened to your patch. (I couldn't find > a clear rejection, but I also don't see it in master.) Me too. OTOH, it was not a clear proposal for inclusion.