From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Commit annotations (was:: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?)
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 22:27:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200806032227.02951.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806031244290.3473@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> One of the things I could imagine using git for is to have "annotation
> branches" for things like code review etc. They'd be a real branch in
> their own right and with their own history, but at the same time they
> could well want to point back to the "code branch" that they annotate by
> considering that another parent in a "non-data merge" (and yes, you'd
> obviously have to use a special merge strategy for things like that, but
> you'd likely integrate it in some "annotation tool chain" rather than
> anything else).
By the way, what is status of git-notes / commit annotations? Did it got
abandoned, on hiatus, or what?
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-03 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-03 1:14 Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful? Jakub Narebski
2008-06-03 2:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-03 3:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-03 5:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-03 5:28 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-03 5:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-03 8:31 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-03 10:40 ` SZEDER Gábor
2008-06-03 19:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-03 20:39 ` SZEDER Gábor
2008-06-03 22:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-03 23:10 ` SZEDER Gábor
2008-06-04 0:35 ` Jeff King
2008-06-04 1:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-03 14:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-03 23:11 ` Miklos Vajna
2008-06-04 0:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-03 4:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-03 6:39 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-06-03 7:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-03 7:32 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-06-03 7:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-03 19:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-03 20:27 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2008-06-03 20:33 ` Commit annotations (was:: Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful?) Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-03 23:59 ` Johan Herland
2008-06-03 2:16 ` Octopus merge: unique (?) to git, but is it useful? Daniel Villeneuve
2008-06-03 10:06 ` Matthieu Moy
2008-06-03 11:27 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-06-03 11:53 ` Matthieu Moy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200806032227.02951.jnareb@gmail.com \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).