git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	Olivier Marin <dkr+ml.git@free.fr>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] remote show: fix the -n option
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 21:19:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080610011913.GA11793@spearce.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vd4mqdrhi.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> At least I care enough to point out that I think you are wrong in this
> case.  "show -n" in the scripted version was never about "dry-run" but
> was about "no-query".
...
> I am CC'ing Shawn who authored 859607d (Teach 'git remote' how to cleanup
> stale tracking branches., 2007-02-02) to give him a chance to point out
> why I am wrong in saying "prune -n" is nonsense.  Maybe there is a valid
> use case for that option, even though I do not see one.

I agree with you Junio.  "prune -n" is nonsense.  You cannot know
what to remove locally that the remote no longer advertises without
querying the remote.

So "prune -n" is nonsense and should issue an error.  "prune --dry-run"
is different and means "query, show what you would delete, but don't
actually delete".

Likewise "show --dry-run" is nonsense.  What does it mean to show
what would show without showing it?  Just show it.   :)

-- 
Shawn.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-10  1:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-08  0:54 remote show/prune: strange -n(--dry-run) option Olivier Marin
2008-06-08 11:03 ` [PATCH] Documentation/git-remote.txt: remove description for useless -n option Olivier Marin
2008-06-08 12:22 ` dkr+ml.git
2008-06-08 20:27   ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-09  0:43     ` Olivier Marin
2008-06-09  0:48       ` [PATCH] remote show: fix the " Olivier Marin
2008-06-09  1:16         ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-09  2:06           ` Olivier Marin
2008-06-09  2:35             ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-09  4:16               ` Olivier Marin
2008-06-09  4:53                 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-09 14:22                   ` Olivier Marin
2008-06-09 15:43                     ` Olivier Marin
2008-06-09 16:31                       ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-09 15:58         ` [PATCH v2] " Olivier Marin
2008-06-09 16:35           ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-09 16:58             ` Olivier Marin
2008-06-09 17:56               ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-09 18:37                 ` Olivier Marin
2008-06-09 20:11                   ` [PATCH] builtin-remote: make reuse of code easier by not die()ing Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-09 20:43                     ` Olivier Marin
2008-06-10  1:10             ` [PATCH v2] remote show: fix the -n option Junio C Hamano
2008-06-10  1:19               ` Shawn O. Pearce [this message]
2008-06-10  2:39                 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-10 14:50               ` [PATCH 0/4] remote show/prune improvement Olivier Marin
2008-06-10 14:51                 ` [PATCH 1/4] remote show: fix the -n option Olivier Marin
2008-06-10 14:51                 ` [PATCH 2/4] builtin-remote: split show_or_prune() in two separate functions Olivier Marin
2008-06-10 14:51                 ` [PATCH 3/4] remote prune: print the list of pruned branches Olivier Marin
2008-06-12  7:00                   ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-12 11:07                     ` Olivier Marin
2008-06-10 14:51                 ` [PATCH 4/4] remote show: list tracked remote branches with -n Olivier Marin
2008-06-10 19:12                   ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-10 22:54                     ` [PATCH v2 " Olivier Marin
2008-06-10 15:09                 ` [PATCH 0/4] remote show/prune improvement Jakub Narebski
2008-06-10 16:10                   ` Olivier Marin
2008-06-10 17:11                     ` Jakub Narebski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080610011913.GA11793@spearce.org \
    --to=spearce@spearce.org \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=dkr+ml.git@free.fr \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).