From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Teemu Likonen Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] git-gc: skip stashes when expiring reflogs Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:07:39 +0300 Message-ID: <20080613090739.GA8265@mithlond.arda.local> References: <5vuJsx6Kidj7e8EABk_d63dLAYuWF-S880RrJKu83cJo_ejU3VN-VA@cipher.nrlssc.navy.mil> <20080611213648.GA13362@glandium.org> <20080611230344.GD19474@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20080612041847.GB24868@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20080613054840.GA27122@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Wincent Colaiuta , Jeff King , Brandon Casey , Johannes Schindelin , Mike Hommey , Junio C Hamano , Git Mailing List To: sverre@rabbelier.nl X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 13 11:10:24 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K75Ib-000696-Cb for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:10:21 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755404AbYFMJJ0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2008 05:09:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755271AbYFMJJ0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2008 05:09:26 -0400 Received: from mta-out.inet.fi ([195.156.147.13]:45613 "EHLO jenni2.rokki.sonera.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754876AbYFMJJZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2008 05:09:25 -0400 Received: from mithlond.arda.local (80.220.180.140) by jenni2.rokki.sonera.fi (8.5.014) id 483E832F00C12287; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:07:46 +0300 Received: from dtw by mithlond.arda.local with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1K75Fz-0002AE-7Z; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:07:39 +0300 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Sverre Rabbelier wrote (2008-06-13 10:53 +0200): > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Wincent Colaiuta > wrote: > > > For me it is quite clear that stashing something _is_ asking for Git > > to remember it. It's an explicit user action. It's a request to > > remember something. Whether or not this is actually the best tool > > for the job of long-term storage is much less important than the > > fact that the user explicitly requested it. [...] > I agree fully with what Wincent is saying, stashes have an explicit > way of cleaning them up: I agree too. I didn't even know that stashes are currently expired automatically. I don't use them that much but I'd expect that what I explicitly ask to save stays there until I decide otherwise.