From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jose =?iso-8859-1?q?Mar=EDa_G=F3mez_Vergara?= Subject: Re: Are C++ contributions welcome? Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:45:51 +0200 Organization: JmGV Research Message-ID: <200806201845.51749.josemaria@jmgv.org> References: <4c88165dd0077363a30b4f98fed16c2f@localhost> <200806201820.54585.josemaria@jmgv.org> <86skv81356.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: David Kastrup X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 20 18:46:53 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K9jlD-0001CG-38 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:46:51 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756456AbYFTQp4 convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:45:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756488AbYFTQp4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:45:56 -0400 Received: from laura.centrologic.com ([212.34.136.105]:47192 "EHLO laura.centrologic.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756366AbYFTQpz convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:45:55 -0400 Received: from [84.76.236.140] (helo=neura.local) by laura.centrologic.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.54) id 1K9jkH-0006Io-DS; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:45:54 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 In-Reply-To: <86skv81356.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> Content-Disposition: inline X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: look nice On Friday 20 June 2008 18:29:09 David Kastrup wrote: > Jose Mar=EDa G=F3mez Vergara writes: > > Before starting, do you have any preference for Qt or Gtk in Git. I= feel > > quite confortable with both of them. > > > > Qt . C++ GPL > > Gtk+. C - LGPL > > > > The quality is good for both of them > > Please take a look at > . It might be > worthwhile not to start from scratch here.