From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miklos Vajna Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] Build in merge Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 02:32:43 +0200 Message-ID: <20080621003243.GF29404@genesis.frugalware.org> References: <7v4p7oq029.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4QouUtKuvByFBvSj" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jun 21 02:33:56 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K9r3D-0000yo-LV for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 02:33:56 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754118AbYFUAcr (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:32:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754490AbYFUAcq (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:32:46 -0400 Received: from virgo.iok.hu ([193.202.89.103]:42056 "EHLO virgo.iok.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754289AbYFUAcp (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:32:45 -0400 Received: from kag.elte.hu (kag.elte.hu [157.181.177.1]) by virgo.iok.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24DD91B2544; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 02:32:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from genesis.frugalware.org (frugalware.elte.hu [157.181.177.34]) by kag.elte.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF1A44699; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 02:09:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by genesis.frugalware.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 87BA61190AD9; Sat, 21 Jun 2008 02:32:43 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7v4p7oq029.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --4QouUtKuvByFBvSj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 08:04:14PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > As usual, comments are welcome. :-) >=20 > Thanks. >=20 > I take that last line of comment to mean "this is still RFC and not for > inclusion yet" ;-) I think the series is fine up to eighth patch (get > octopus merge base). In fact only the version that had "WIP" in the subject was sent not for inclusion. ;-) > I'll queue the whole thing (still strictly as "test merge" basis) to 'pu'; > I've fixed 3 "old-style C function definition" issues you have in the > tenth patch (build in merge), and I have some other issues with the ninth > one (filter independent). Thanks. I'm using the kernel's scripts/checkpatch.pl, but it does not have such a check, and I missed it. Currently I have 12 patches in my branch; if there will be no objections to the new "filter independent" one, then I will resend the series excluding the first 8 to avoid unnecessary traffic, if that is OK to you. --4QouUtKuvByFBvSj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkhcTCsACgkQe81tAgORUJaVJQCeIzpO57HWk6DK9jCV5zTkewK5 jkkAoI1qBXrLw9GPG8ZY8N3JbkhUJ1hA =bJo4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4QouUtKuvByFBvSj--