From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephan Beyer Subject: Re: git sequencer prototype Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:53:44 +0200 Message-ID: <20080701145344.GB5301@leksak.fem-net> References: <1214879914-17866-1-git-send-email-s-beyer@gmx.net> <7vabh2oulb.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 01 16:55:08 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KDhFk-0003ue-LZ for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:54:45 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755291AbYGAOxr (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 10:53:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754712AbYGAOxr (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 10:53:47 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:54525 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754678AbYGAOxq (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 10:53:46 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 01 Jul 2008 14:53:44 -0000 Received: from q137.fem.tu-ilmenau.de (EHLO leksak.fem-net) [141.24.46.137] by mail.gmx.net (mp003) with SMTP; 01 Jul 2008 16:53:44 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1499303 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/lfTdhNwvlkZehikGnZVd0Y0Yvh+7N47G4SmRwJJ S/qGyU+WavCbd9 Received: from sbeyer by leksak.fem-net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KDhEm-0003Mr-93; Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:53:44 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vabh2oulb.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.73 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, > > The migration patches are a little hard to code-review in the diff-form, > > but feel free to apply, test, and then look at the code ;) > > Heh, these three typically come in different order. Look at the log > message and docs to see if the design is sound, then look at the code, and > if things overall look Ok, then finally apply and test. Hmm, I usually prefer testing first (on such large patches), because I think I value things different after I've tested them. > I unfortunately ran out of time tonight and will look at them probably > Thursday evening. Don't hurry. > It seems that another GSoC topic is finally nearing > completion and I can shift my attention to other topics now. Yes, the builtin merge should perhaps get some more priority first. > By the way Christian is not CC'ed? Shame on me, I forgot to Cc my mentors ;-) Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Beyer , PGP 0x6EDDD207FCC5040F