From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephan Beyer Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 3/4] Add git-sequencer test suite (t3350) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 19:31:30 +0200 Message-ID: <20080705173130.GA8099@leksak.fem-net> References: <1214879914-17866-1-git-send-email-s-beyer@gmx.net> <1214879914-17866-2-git-send-email-s-beyer@gmx.net> <1214879914-17866-3-git-send-email-s-beyer@gmx.net> <1214879914-17866-4-git-send-email-s-beyer@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano , Johannes Schindelin To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jul 05 19:32:44 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KFBcp-00028s-GM for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 05 Jul 2008 19:32:43 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752611AbYGERbq (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jul 2008 13:31:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752535AbYGERbq (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jul 2008 13:31:46 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:35079 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752113AbYGERbp (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jul 2008 13:31:45 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 Jul 2008 17:31:43 -0000 Received: from q137.fem.tu-ilmenau.de (EHLO leksak.fem-net) [141.24.46.137] by mail.gmx.net (mp015) with SMTP; 05 Jul 2008 19:31:43 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1499303 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+9ontWKtu9UsXxyLFnZf+8Jvoahk35NKA7KBcCf7 Un0K0OrXoLFy1h Received: from sbeyer by leksak.fem-net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KFBbe-0006nX-RR; Sat, 05 Jul 2008 19:31:30 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1214879914-17866-4-git-send-email-s-beyer@gmx.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.6899999999999999 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, I've just noticed that those tag names: + git tag A && + git tag B && + git tag C && + git tag D && + git tag E && + git tag F && + git tag I && +ref refs/tags/CE are perhaps a bad idea, because they could also be an abbreviated SHA1. As it seems, git does not think this is ambiguous, since the exact tag name exists. So it could make sense to add a non-[0-9A-Fa-f] prefix, but it does not seem to be necessary. Hmmm, so this mail is just a mental note :) Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Beyer , PGP 0x6EDDD207FCC5040F