From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sylvain Joyeux Subject: Re: [PATCH] better git-submodule status output Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 16:57:26 +0200 Message-ID: <20080707145726.GI3696@joyeux> References: <20080701150119.GE5852@joyeux> <7vhcb3o7q3.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080706160758.GA23385@jhaampe.org> <20080707062142.GA5506@jhaampe.org> <32541b130807070725p6fa4d0dfne9f04bc857920dc7@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Avery Pennarun , Junio C Hamano , Lars Hjemli , Ping Yin , Mark Levedahl , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 07 16:58:36 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KFsAi-0003Zp-Si for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:58:33 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753626AbYGGO5f (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:57:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753427AbYGGO5f (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:57:35 -0400 Received: from smtprelay04.ispgateway.de ([80.67.18.16]:46394 "EHLO smtprelay04.ispgateway.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753426AbYGGO5e (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:57:34 -0400 Received: from [134.102.219.50] (helo=joyeux) by smtprelay04.ispgateway.de with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KFs9f-0001FD-GK; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:57:27 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-Df-Sender: [pbs]311155 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > > Thus, I'd say the best fix would be to find a way to have "git pull" or > > "git fetch" in the supermodule also do a fetch in the submodule. > If I am actively working on the submodule, the supermodule has _no > business_ trying to wreck my state. Is it possible to make 'fetch' only .. well .. fetch objects, without updating any refs ? In that case it would wreck no state as no state would be updated. -- ======================================================================= Dr. Ing. Sylvain Joyeux sylvain.joyeux@dfki.de Researcher DFKI Robotik Lab -- Bremen http://www.dfki.de/robotik Tel: 0049 421 218 64136 =======================================================================