From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre Habouzit Subject: THREADED_DELTA_SEARCH Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:53:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20080710075327.GD24819@artemis.madism.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="pQhZXvAqiZgbeUkD"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=SHA1 To: Git ML X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jul 10 09:54:45 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KGqyx-0002on-5A for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:54:27 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751049AbYGJHx3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:53:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751435AbYGJHx3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:53:29 -0400 Received: from pan.madism.org ([88.191.52.104]:36483 "EHLO hermes.madism.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750955AbYGJHx3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:53:29 -0400 Received: from madism.org (APuteaux-103-1-3-109.w217-128.abo.wanadoo.fr [217.128.49.109]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "artemis.madism.org", Issuer "madism.org" (verified OK)) by hermes.madism.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 886153475F for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:53:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: by madism.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A3D574098; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:53:27 +0200 (CEST) Mail-Followup-To: Pierre Habouzit , Git ML Content-Disposition: inline X-Face: $(^e[V4D-[`f2EmMGz@fgWK!e.B~2g.{08lKPU(nc1J~z\4B>*JEVq:E]7G-\6$Ycr4<;Z!|VY6Grt]+RsS$IMV)f>2)M="tY:ZPcU;&%it2D81X^kNya0=L]"vZmLP+UmKhgq+u*\.dJ8G!N&=EvlD User-Agent: Madmutt/devel (Linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --pQhZXvAqiZgbeUkD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm using it in production for quite a long time now, and I wonder if there is any specific reason why it's not default. Debian activated it by default too a couple of weeks ago, which means that it's in production on quite a large scale, and there are no issues reported either. Would a patch making it default be accepted ? It's quite handy given that SMP machines are really pervasive nowadays=E2=80=A6 --=20 =C2=B7O=C2=B7 Pierre Habouzit =C2=B7=C2=B7O madcoder@debia= n.org OOO http://www.madism.org --pQhZXvAqiZgbeUkD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkh1v/cACgkQvGr7W6HudhxaAACcDrJ+VjcN2e1NiziAGhvagkau 77cAn3FE6QhK2kBWLLFQBAgtQIGaMzvA =3dTL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pQhZXvAqiZgbeUkD--