From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Cc: Lea Wiemann <lewiemann@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, John Hawley <warthog19@eaglescrag.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] add new Git::Repo API
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:07:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807192107.56333.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080718165407.GU10151@machine.or.cz>
On Fri, 18 July 2008, Petr Baudis wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 01:41:38AM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 July 2008, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > > Here is an idea: Introduce Git::Command object that will have very
> > > general interface and look like
> > >
> > > my $c = Git::Command->new(['git', '--git-dir=.', 'cat-file', \
> > > '-p', 'bla'], {pipe_out=>1})
> > > ...
> > > $c->close();
> >
> > Errr... how do you read from such a pipe? <$c> I think wouldn't work,
> > unless you would use some trickery...
>
> That's good point; it might either be done using some trickery, or
> $c->pipe. The idea behind having a special object for it though is to
> have *unified* (no matter how simple) error handling. You might not
> detect the command erroring out at the open time.
>
> Is there a better approach for solving this?
I don't know if it is _better_ approach, but the _alternate_ approach
would be to use:
my $c = Git::Command->new(['git', '--git-dir=.', 'cat-file', \
'-p', 'bla'], {out=>my $fh, err=>undef})
...
while (my $line = <$fh>) {
...
$c->close();
And trickery would be to use blessed filehandle, or what? Or perhaps
extending IO::Handle (but not all like using object methods for I/O
handles)?
> > > and a Git::CommandFactory with a nicer interface that would look like
> > >
> > > my $cf = Git::CommandFactory->new('git', '--git-dir=.');
> > > my $c = $cf->output_pipe('cat-file', '-p', 'bla');
> > > $c->close();
> > >
> > > Then, Git::Repo would have a single Git::CommandFactory instance
> > > pre-initialized with the required calling convention, and returned by
> > > e.g. cmd() method. Then, from the user POV, you would just:
> > >
> > > my $repo = Git::Repo->new;
> > > $repo->cmd->output_pipe('cat-file', '-p', 'bla');
> > >
> > > Or am I overdoing it?
> >
> > You are probably overdoing it.
> >
> > I think it would be good to have the following interface
> >
> > Git->output_pipe('ls-remotes', $URL, '--heads');
>
> This is problematic; I think mixing the new and old interface within a
> single class is very bad idea, we should have Git::Standalone or
> something for this. Or, just, default Git::CommandFactory. ;-)
I forgot that we cannot obsolete / replace old interface. Nevertheless
it would be nice to be able to use for example
Git::Cmd->output_pipe('ls-remotes', $URL, '--heads');
but also
output_pipe('myscript.sh', <arg1>, <arg2>);
See also below for alternative interfaces to Git::Cmd->output_pipe();
> > [...]
> > $r = Git::Repo->new(<git_dir>);
> > $r->output_pipe('ls_tree', 'HEAD');
> > [...]
> > $nb = Git::Repo::NonBare->new(<git_dir>[, <working_area>]);
> > $nb->output_pipe('ls-files');
> >
> >
> > How can it be done with minimal effort, unfortunately I don't know...
>
> Well, this interface is almost identical to what I delineated, except
> that I have the extra ->cmd-> step there. But maybe, we could go with
> your API and instead have Git::CommandFactory as a base of Git::Repo?
> The hierarchy would be
>
> Git::CommandFactory - provides the cmd_pipe toolkit
> |
> Git::Repo - provides repository model
> |
> Git::Repo::NonBare - additional working-copy-related methods
>
> I think I will post a sample implementation sometime over the weekend.
Thanks.
I think this is a very good idea. Although... you mix somewhat here
relationships. Relationship between Git::CommandFactory (Git::Cmd?)
is a bit different than relationship between Git::Repo and
Git::Repo::NonBare. Git::Repo::NonBare is a case of Git::Repo which
additionally knows where its working copy (Git::WC?) is, and where
inside working copy we are (if we are inside working copy). Git::Repo
uses Git::CommandFactory to route calls to git commands, and to
provide default '--git-dir=<repo_path>' argument.
What I'd like to have is a way to easily set in _one_ place where git
binary can be found, even if we are using different repositories, call
git commands not related to git repository.
Should we use
Git::Cmd->output_pipe('ls-remotes', $URL, '--heads');
or
output_pipe(GIT, 'ls-remotes', $URL, '--heads');
or
output_pipe($GIT, 'ls-remotes', $URL, '--heads');
or
output_pipe($Git::GIT, 'ls-remotes', $URL, '--heads');
we would want to be able to set where git binary is once (and for all),
for example via
Git::Cmd->set_git('/usr/local/bin/git');
or something like that.
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-19 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-11 1:06 [PATCH 0/3] Git::Repo API and gitweb caching Lea Wiemann
2008-07-11 1:10 ` [PATCH 1/3 v9] gitweb: add test suite with Test::WWW::Mechanize::CGI Lea Wiemann
2008-07-11 1:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] add new Git::Repo API Lea Wiemann
2008-07-13 21:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-14 1:04 ` Lea Wiemann
2008-07-13 23:28 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-14 2:29 ` Lea Wiemann
2008-07-14 1:40 ` Petr Baudis
2008-07-14 22:19 ` Lea Wiemann
2008-07-18 16:48 ` Petr Baudis
2008-07-18 17:05 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-18 17:17 ` Petr Baudis
2008-07-18 18:09 ` Lea Wiemann
2008-07-18 18:19 ` Petr Baudis
2008-07-18 18:23 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-19 20:54 ` Statictics on Git.pm usage in git commands (was: [PATCH 2/3] add new Git::Repo API) Jakub Narebski
2008-07-19 21:14 ` Petr Baudis
2008-07-20 0:16 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-20 21:38 ` Petr Baudis
2008-07-20 10:38 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-20 10:49 ` Petr Baudis
2008-07-20 12:33 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-20 12:58 ` Petr Baudis
2008-07-20 13:21 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-14 23:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] add new Git::Repo API Jakub Narebski
2008-07-15 0:11 ` Lea Wiemann
2008-07-18 16:54 ` Petr Baudis
2008-07-19 0:03 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-19 19:07 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2008-07-20 21:36 ` Petr Baudis
2008-07-20 21:50 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-16 18:21 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-16 20:32 ` Lea Wiemann
2008-07-17 23:49 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-18 13:40 ` Lea Wiemann
2008-07-18 15:35 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-18 16:51 ` Lea Wiemann
2008-07-11 1:11 ` [PATCH 3/3] gitweb: use new Git::Repo API, and add optional caching Lea Wiemann
2008-07-14 21:23 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-14 23:03 ` Lea Wiemann
2008-07-14 23:14 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-14 23:56 ` Lea Wiemann
2008-07-15 0:52 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-15 1:16 ` Lea Wiemann
2008-07-15 1:28 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-15 1:44 ` J.H.
2008-07-15 1:50 ` Lea Wiemann
2008-07-15 2:03 ` J.H.
2008-07-11 1:21 ` [PATCH 0/3] Git::Repo API and gitweb caching Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-11 9:33 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-11 14:07 ` Lea Wiemann
2008-07-11 16:27 ` Abhijit Menon-Sen
2008-07-12 15:08 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-19 5:35 ` Lea Wiemann
2008-08-18 19:34 ` Lea Wiemann
2008-08-18 19:39 ` [PATCH 1/3 v10] gitweb: add test suite with Test::WWW::Mechanize::CGI Lea Wiemann
2008-08-19 1:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-19 14:37 ` Lea Wiemann
2008-08-18 19:39 ` [PATCH 2/3 v2] add new Perl API: Git::Repo, Git::Commit, Git::Tag, and Git::RepoRoot Lea Wiemann
2008-08-19 1:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-19 15:06 ` Lea Wiemann
2008-08-19 13:51 ` Lea Wiemann
2008-08-18 19:39 ` [PATCH 3/3 v2] gitweb: use new Git::Repo API, and add optional caching Lea Wiemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200807192107.56333.jnareb@gmail.com \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lewiemann@gmail.com \
--cc=pasky@suse.cz \
--cc=warthog19@eaglescrag.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).