From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miklos Vajna Subject: Re: [RFC] Stopping those fat "What's cooking in git.git" threads Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:21:44 +0200 Message-ID: <20080720212144.GQ10347@genesis.frugalware.org> References: <20080720205125.GP10347@genesis.frugalware.org> <7vsku44679.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0jUhJxQJ3IDt3BFR" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jul 20 23:22:47 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KKgMf-0006GY-Nk for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:22:46 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750786AbYGTVVq (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:21:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750733AbYGTVVq (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:21:46 -0400 Received: from virgo.iok.hu ([193.202.89.103]:49395 "EHLO virgo.iok.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750698AbYGTVVq (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:21:46 -0400 Received: from kag.elte.hu (kag.elte.hu [157.181.177.1]) by virgo.iok.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302E41B251E; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:21:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from genesis.frugalware.org (frugalware.elte.hu [157.181.177.34]) by kag.elte.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C07B44465E; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:41:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by genesis.frugalware.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DD95F177001C; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:21:44 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vsku44679.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --0jUhJxQJ3IDt3BFR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 02:05:30PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > But I think it is a good idea to change the subject when responding to one > part of the message to say which topic your response is about. It was me as well, who did not change the subject; I'll try to pay attention to do so. > I do not know if stripping "In-reply-to" is a great idea, though. They > are responses, aren't they? Personally I'm fine with mutt's "break thread" feature, I just proposed it because I saw it was mentioned multiple times that gmane does not handle huge threads nicely. But yes, you have reason about keeping the header makes sense as well. --0jUhJxQJ3IDt3BFR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkiDrGgACgkQe81tAgORUJZ/yQCgkqxmnbZ+LZt36NNHUsAjvIvT QmkAnjL6mWlELYKHk5LMfndjck12iDgq =/+fU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0jUhJxQJ3IDt3BFR--