From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephan Beyer Subject: Re: [HACK] t/test-lib.sh HACK: Add -s/--show-hack to test suite. Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 03:24:38 +0200 Message-ID: <20080721012438.GF5950@leksak.fem-net> References: <1215375751-30853-1-git-send-email-s-beyer@gmx.net> <20080707140841.GB6726@leksak.fem-net> <20080712222212.GC22323@leksak.fem-net> <20080713110904.GG22323@leksak.fem-net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 21 03:25:45 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KKk9o-0005hq-1G for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 03:25:44 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755999AbYGUBYo (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:24:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756882AbYGUBYo (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:24:44 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:60585 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1756742AbYGUBYn (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:24:43 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2008 01:24:41 -0000 Received: from q137.fem.tu-ilmenau.de (EHLO leksak.fem-net) [141.24.46.137] by mail.gmx.net (mp035) with SMTP; 21 Jul 2008 03:24:41 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1499303 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18n+fg9zKsnRao0Qjh/svhjygu0+7wzCCPO1NbLfW YAXHCHr801gtg3 Received: from sbeyer by leksak.fem-net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KKk8k-0002lw-PZ; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 03:24:38 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.75 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > You will have to scroll back a few lines to see exactly what failed, but > you will see the exact commands (also of functions that were called), > together with their return values (i.e. what the function output, and what > was assigned to variables). I've tested again and found it now. Thanks! It's a littler harder to see, but now I know that I should look for the last "+ eval_ret=" line, ...that makes it easier ;) Puh, now I can finally move this thread to the archives :) Regards. -- Stephan Beyer , PGP 0x6EDDD207FCC5040F