From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: q: faster way to integrate/merge lots of topic branches?
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:06:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080723150621.GA8499@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080723145622.GA23440@elte.hu>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > Shouldn't this be:
> >
> > [ -f "$CACHE" -a "$CACHE" -nt .git/refs/heads/$BRANCH ] && {
> >
> > ?
>
> yeah, i just figured it out too ... the hard way :)
>
> Updated script below. This works fine across resets in the master
> branch.
>
> While it's fast in the empty-merge case, it's not as fast as i'd like
> it to be in the almost-empty-merge case.
When i update a topic branch, i first get a relatively fast run:
earth4:~/tip> time todo-merge-all
merging all branches ...
Auto-merged arch/x86/kernel/genx2apic_uv_x.c
Merge made by recursive.
arch/x86/kernel/genx2apic_uv_x.c | 1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
... merge done.
real 0m6.625s
user 0m3.740s
sys 0m2.563s
Then on the next run it's slower:
earth4:~/tip> time todo-merge-all
merging all branches ...
... merge done.
real 0m30.823s
user 0m23.403s
sys 0m7.545s
that's unfortunate. The freshly updated topic branch was at the end of
the run, now all other topic branches will have to run slow at least
once until they become cached again.
Perhaps the cache should update all other current topics to the new
sha1, to establish the fact that they were not merged this time. (and
that they are still not to be merged)
(It's still much faster than completely uncached though, because of the
overlap in sha1's.)
Third (empty) run is fast again, because it's fully cached:
earth4:~/tip> time todo-merge-all
merging all branches ...
... merge done.
real 0m3.036s
user 0m1.360s
sys 0m1.782s
But it would be nice if the cache worked more intelligently in the
one-topic-updated-only case as well.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-23 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-23 13:05 q: faster way to integrate/merge lots of topic branches? Ingo Molnar
2008-07-23 13:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-23 13:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-23 14:47 ` Jay Soffian
2008-07-23 14:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-23 15:06 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-07-23 13:40 ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-07-23 14:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-23 14:57 ` Miklos Vajna
2008-07-23 13:41 ` Sergey Vlasov
2008-07-23 14:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-23 14:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-23 13:56 ` SZEDER Gábor
2008-07-23 14:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-23 17:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-23 22:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] builtin-branch.c: remove unused code in append_ref() callback function Junio C Hamano
2008-07-23 22:15 ` [PATCH] builtin-branch.c: optimize --merged and --no-merged Junio C Hamano
2008-07-24 7:16 ` Lars Hjemli
2008-07-24 8:29 ` Nanako Shiraishi
2008-07-24 10:03 ` Lars Hjemli
2008-07-24 15:29 ` q: faster way to integrate/merge lots of topic branches? Ingo Molnar
2008-07-23 18:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-23 18:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-23 20:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-24 15:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-25 8:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-23 14:06 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-07-23 14:06 ` Santi Béjar
2008-07-23 17:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-23 19:09 ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-07-23 20:27 ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-07-23 20:40 ` Pierre Habouzit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080723150621.GA8499@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jaysoffian@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).