From: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Bjjjrn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] index-pack: correctly initialize appended objects
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:42:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080725164202.GC21117@spearce.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0807251513240.11976@eeepc-johanness>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> > On 2008.07.24 22:21:14 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > > Reading get_data_from_pack(), it does rely on hdr_size, idx.offset and
> > > idx.offset of the next entry to be set correctly. The function does
> > > not seem to use type (which the patch is also setting) nor real_type
> > > (which the patch does not set).
> >
> > type is used in get_base_data().
> >
> > > However, the code checks objects[nth].real_type all over the place in
> > > the code. Doesn't the lack of real_type assignment in
> > > append_obj_to_pack() affect them in any way?
> >
> > I had thought that resolve_delta() would set that, but it seems that we
> > never call that function like that. Hm...
>
> So, let's add the comment as Nico suggested, and set real_type, too? (And
> it would be smashing if you could verify that the type is indeed correctly
> set to non-delta...)
>
> I think that setting real_type is necessary to have less surprises when
> the code is extended in the future.
The patch looks correct, but it should set real_type too because
I'm pretty sure we use that when we unpack the delta base again if
it was pruned out of memory.
--
Shawn.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-25 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-24 17:32 [PATCH] index-pack: correctly initialize appended objects Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-24 18:07 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-07-25 5:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-25 10:24 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-25 11:54 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-07-25 12:01 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-07-25 12:24 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-07-25 18:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-25 11:55 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-07-25 13:15 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-25 16:42 ` Shawn O. Pearce [this message]
2008-07-25 17:13 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-07-25 17:20 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-07-26 3:04 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-25 11:48 ` Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080725164202.GC21117@spearce.org \
--to=spearce@spearce.org \
--cc=B.Steinbrink@gmx.de \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=nico@cam.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).