From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephan Beyer Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Move launch_editor() from builtin-tag.c to editor.c Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 05:14:51 +0200 Message-ID: <20080726031451.GG13539@leksak.fem-net> References: <1217003322-10291-1-git-send-email-s-beyer@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jul 26 05:16:09 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KMaGN-0000SQ-Ay for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 05:16:07 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752752AbYGZDPE (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:15:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752726AbYGZDPE (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:15:04 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:55201 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752718AbYGZDPD (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:15:03 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2008 03:15:01 -0000 Received: from q137.fem.tu-ilmenau.de (EHLO leksak.fem-net) [141.24.46.137] by mail.gmx.net (mp062) with SMTP; 26 Jul 2008 05:15:01 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1499303 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18Omr8e2KEOzgAYQ7gVXnkKZJRynIO1I9xOFPCzmV vUdxafJYUsGa+x Received: from sbeyer by leksak.fem-net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KMaFA-0001oL-08; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 05:14:52 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.64 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Stephan Beyer wrote: > > > To be kind to the maintainer, I've also run the test suite again, all > > tests passed except t4116*.sh, but this is not my fault. It's the fault > > of 9a885fac. > > You do understand that you cost everybody, who actually cared to take a > look for herself, a few minutes? Yes, now I see that I forgot to mention the subject. I'm sorry. > Dscho "who thinks that so many mails would be better if the posters would > read the mails themselves and try to imagine how readers would perceive > them" You're right. In my case I perhaps should've *first* looked if I could fix the TAR issue and then first send the fix for the TAR stuff and then remove the text from here. But I noticed the failure, wrote about it here, sent this mail, looked for the reason of the error, ... the wrong order, as it seems. I try to improve. Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Beyer , PGP 0x6EDDD207FCC5040F