From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Riesen Subject: Re: GIT 1.6.0-rc1 Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:37:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20080728213727.GA3721@blimp.local> References: <7vy73myim5.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080728063838.GB4234@blimp.local> <7vwsj6tsm3.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Reply-To: Alex Riesen Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 29 08:11:12 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KNiQP-0007v7-C7 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:11:09 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751300AbYG2GKH (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:10:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751251AbYG2GKH (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:10:07 -0400 Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de ([81.169.146.182]:40542 "EHLO mo-p05-ob.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751103AbYG2GKF (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:10:05 -0400 X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 X-RZG-AUTH: :YSxENQjhO8RswxTRIGdg20xf50O7 Received: from tigra.home (Fae3d.f.strato-dslnet.de [195.4.174.61]) by post.webmailer.de (klopstock mo59) (RZmta 16.47) with ESMTP id g03811k6T3R2IM ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:10:03 +0200 (MEST) (envelope-from: ) Received: from blimp (unknown [192.168.0.8]) by tigra.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96201277BD; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:10:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by blimp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D0FEC36D1A; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:37:28 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vwsj6tsm3.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano, Mon, Jul 28, 2008 08:44:52 +0200: > Alex Riesen writes: > > > t2103-update-index-ignore-missing.sh still broken on Windows because > > of stat.st_size being 0 for directories there. > > I recall we did not reach a useful conclusion of that discussion. Why isn't the proposed patch useful? (and would it be possible to make the answer out of plain, small and short words?)