From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olivier Galibert Subject: Re: Bizarre missing changes (git bug?) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:48:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20080729124827.GB14052@dspnet.fr.eu.org> References: <20080729053108.GH26997@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeff King , Linus Torvalds , Tim Harper , git@vger.kernel.org To: Roman Zippel X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 29 14:49:45 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KNodx-0006G2-9K for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:49:33 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758368AbYG2Mse (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:48:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758360AbYG2Msd (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:48:33 -0400 Received: from dspnet.fr.eu.org ([213.186.44.138]:4962 "EHLO dspnet.fr.eu.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751717AbYG2Msd (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:48:33 -0400 Received: by dspnet.fr.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id A64BFA4AD8; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:48:27 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:32:14PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Most frequently this involves changes where the same change is merged > twice. [...] You're not answering the question. You cite cases when you consider both the default and the full-history output incorrect from a usefulness point of view. The question is, what would the correct output be, from your point of view? What should be shown, and what shouldn't? OG.