git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
To: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC/PATCH v4 2/2] documentation: merge-base: explain "git merge-base" with more than 2 args
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:04:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080730070443.f137efd1.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> (raw)

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
---
 Documentation/git-merge-base.txt |   77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/git-merge-base.txt b/Documentation/git-merge-base.txt
index 1a7ecbf..fd4b5c9 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-merge-base.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-merge-base.txt
@@ -8,26 +8,81 @@ git-merge-base - Find as good common ancestors as possible for a merge
 
 SYNOPSIS
 --------
-'git merge-base' [--all] <commit> <commit>
+'git merge-base' [--all] <commit> <commit>...
 
 DESCRIPTION
 -----------
 
-'git-merge-base' finds as good a common ancestor as possible between
-the two commits. That is, given two commits A and B, `git merge-base A
-B` will output a commit which is reachable from both A and B through
-the parent relationship.
+'git-merge-base' finds best common ancestor(s) between two commits to use
+in a three-way merge.  One common ancestor is 'better' than another common
+ancestor if the latter is an ancestor of the former.  A common ancestor
+that does not have any better common ancestor than it is a 'best common
+ancestor', i.e. a 'merge base'.  Note that there can be more than one
+merge bases between two commits.
 
-Given a selection of equally good common ancestors it should not be
-relied on to decide in any particular way.
-
-The 'git-merge-base' algorithm is still in flux - use the source...
+Among the two commits to compute their merge bases, one is specified by
+the first commit argument on the command line; the other commit is a
+(possibly hypothetical) commit that is a merge across all the remaining
+commits on the command line.  As the most common special case, giving only
+two commits from the command line means computing the merge base between
+the given two commits.
 
 OPTIONS
 -------
 --all::
-	Output all common ancestors for the two commits instead of
-	just one.
+	Output all merge bases for the commits, instead of just one.
+
+DISCUSSION
+----------
+
+Given two commits 'A' and 'B', `git merge-base A B` will output a commit
+which is reachable from both 'A' and 'B' through the parent relationship.
+
+For example, with this topology:
+
+                 o---o---o---B
+                /
+        ---o---1---o---o---o---A
+
+the merge base between 'A' and 'B' is '1'.
+
+Given three commits 'A', 'B' and 'C', `git merge-base A B C` will compute the
+merge base between 'A' and an hypothetical commit 'M', which is a merge
+between 'B' and 'C'.  For example, with this topology:
+
+               o---o---o---o---C
+              /
+             /   o---o---o---B
+            /   /
+        ---2---1---o---o---o---A
+
+the result of `git merge-base A B C` is '1'.  This is because the
+equivalent topology with a merge commit 'M' between 'B' and 'C' is:
+
+
+               o---o---o---o---o
+              /                 \
+             /   o---o---o---o---M
+            /   /
+        ---2---1---o---o---o---A
+
+and the result of `git merge-base A M` is '1'.  Commit '2' is also a
+common ancestor between 'A' and 'M', but '1' is a better common ancestor,
+because '2' is an ancestor of '1'.  Hence, '2' is not a merge base.
+
+When the history involves criss-cross merges, there can be more than one
+'best' common ancestors between two commits.  For example, with this
+topology:
+
+       ---1---o---A
+	   \ /
+	    X
+	   / \
+       ---2---o---o---B
+
+both '1' and '2' are merge-base of A and B.  Neither one is better than
+the other (both are 'best' merge base).  When `--all` option is not given,
+it is unspecified which best one is output.
 
 Author
 ------
-- 
1.6.0.rc0.42.g186458.dirty

                 reply	other threads:[~2008-07-30  5:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080730070443.f137efd1.chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
    --to=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=vmiklos@frugalware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).