From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bart Trojanowski <bart@jukie.net>
Subject: Re: Git Community Book
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:20:45 -0400
Message-ID: <20080730132044.GF17649@jukie.net>
References: <d411cc4a0807290920p62f5d7e1r727a62ef2b4611fc@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.1.00.0807291716460.19665@iabervon.org> <7v1w1cb940.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: git list <git@vger.kernel.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jul 30 15:21:49 2008
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1KOBch-0007Qx-Vy
	for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:21:48 +0200
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752648AbYG3NUr (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git-2@m.gmane.org>);
	Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:20:47 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751777AbYG3NUr
	(ORCPT <rfc822;git-outgoing>); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:20:47 -0400
Received: from tau.jukie.net ([216.239.93.128]:41052 "EHLO tau.jukie.net"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751263AbYG3NUq (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:20:46 -0400
Received: by tau.jukie.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 4E565C00CC9; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:20:45 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7v1w1cb940.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <git.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/90780>

* Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> [080729 18:48]:
> I'd very strongly second this.  If somebody is really into screencasts
> (and especially from the Ruby circle, I would guess), this may be worth
> a look:
> 
>     http://excess.org/article/2008/07/ogre-git-tutorial/

Thank you very much for the plug, Junio.

> I saw a couple of technical inaccuracies in the presentation (I do not
> expect any presentation or screencast to be perfect; I've never seen one
> without any technical error anyway, perhaps other than my own at OLS a few
> years ago)

Could you let me know what the biggest inaccuracies were?  I would like
to correct my mistakes and update the slides.

Cheers,
-Bart

-- 
				WebSig: http://www.jukie.net/~bart/sig/