From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: git blame not respecting --find-copies-harder ? Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:33:52 -0400 Message-ID: <20080731103351.GA22895@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20080731064814.GA32431@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vfxpq3559.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080731072149.GA2304@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7v8wvi33ok.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080731082553.GA19522@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7v8wvizc16.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080731090348.GB20691@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20080731091515.GC12867@artemis.madism.org> <20080731093410.GA21396@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20080731102223.GD12867@artemis.madism.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , Git Mailinglist To: Pierre Habouzit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jul 31 12:35:12 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KOVV0-0006Ns-1X for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:35:10 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755977AbYGaKeF (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:34:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755882AbYGaKeE (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:34:04 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:1288 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755169AbYGaKeB (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:34:01 -0400 Received: (qmail 22886 invoked by uid 111); 31 Jul 2008 10:33:54 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:33:54 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:33:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080731102223.GD12867@artemis.madism.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:22:23PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > [Pierre, you have the bogus MFT header that people are often complaining > > about. Either I have to do extra work to fix the headers, or more people > > end up in the To: field. I don't personally care about the latter, but > > it seems that others organize their mail based on To versus Cc] > > [ err if you do a list reply, nobody ends up in To:... but oh well I > can probably remove it, it'll just make my own mutt git folder > awkwardly colorized. ] I can't do a list reply, as mutt sees no list (and I didn't bother setting up a 'subscribe' variable, since I didn't want to generate MFTs in the first place). However, I just realized that mutt has an honor_followup_to, which will do what I want (AFAICT, there is no point in honoring MFT when using the conventions of this mailing list). But I wonder if it is as simple in other clients. -Peff