From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miklos Vajna Subject: Re: do without .netrc Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:50:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20080806085025.GU32057@genesis.frugalware.org> References: <4898DBA6.1060707@univie.ac.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ArLPwaGbL3RpdDl2" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen?= Mangler X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Aug 06 10:51:37 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KQek3-0003oe-DB for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:51:35 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763500AbYHFIua (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Aug 2008 04:50:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763669AbYHFIu3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Aug 2008 04:50:29 -0400 Received: from virgo.iok.hu ([193.202.89.103]:60365 "EHLO virgo.iok.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763354AbYHFIu1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Aug 2008 04:50:27 -0400 Received: from kag.elte.hu (kag.elte.hu [157.181.177.1]) by virgo.iok.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C09471B2550; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:50:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from genesis.frugalware.org (frugalware.elte.hu [157.181.177.34]) by kag.elte.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D83804465E; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:01:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by genesis.frugalware.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5089C11901AF; Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:50:25 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4898DBA6.1060707@univie.ac.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --ArLPwaGbL3RpdDl2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 01:00:54AM +0200, J=FCrgen Mangler wrote: > it is working without a:b@ part, but ~/.netrc instead >=20 > :-(, is it possible without .netrc I thought questions have question marks. ;-) Anyway, what is the advantage of not using a ~/.netrc? --ArLPwaGbL3RpdDl2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkiZZdEACgkQe81tAgORUJY0rQCghccQV/5R6xulDhpqTQ4o/iVW T3oAoKoM/GNuGU60W4YCtRVPZIKyQ/CJ =rwhM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ArLPwaGbL3RpdDl2--