From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephan Beyer Subject: Re: [PATCH (1b)] merge-recursive.c: Add more generic merge_recursive_generic() Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:29:38 +0200 Message-ID: <20080813172938.GC12871@leksak.fem-net> References: <1218559514-16890-1-git-send-email-vmiklos@frugalware.org> <1218572040-23362-1-git-send-email-s-beyer@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Miklos Vajna , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Barkalow X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Aug 13 19:30:55 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KTKBM-0004Yo-N8 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:30:49 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755312AbYHMR3o (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:29:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754840AbYHMR3o (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:29:44 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:35766 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753742AbYHMR3n (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:29:43 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Aug 2008 17:29:40 -0000 Received: from q137.fem.tu-ilmenau.de (EHLO leksak.fem-net) [141.24.46.137] by mail.gmx.net (mp032) with SMTP; 13 Aug 2008 19:29:41 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1499303 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/iSdZDaDni/TcVEeENc8LZEfpbFaeH6OEE8n4Oxn 23aFgPS1DLfE0Q Received: from sbeyer by leksak.fem-net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KTKAE-0003bO-Op; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:29:38 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.78 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, Daniel Barkalow wrote: > You might look at builtin-checkout and see if merge_working_tree() could > be made cleaner with this API, or if some other API could accomodate both > cases more nicely. Puhh, I've not dug into merging stuff that deep, but for me it does not look that this can be done in a useful way, i.e. merge_working_tree() does not do a recursive merge. Regards. -- Stephan Beyer , PGP 0x6EDDD207FCC5040F