From: Jan Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>
To: Marco Costalba <mcostalba@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [QGIT RFC] Unit tests for QGit
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:00:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080818180048.GA15520@efreet.light.src> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e5bfff550808171330w28dda6a2m32b0e51b1ef73cdc@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 21:30:46 +0100, Marco Costalba wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Jan Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz> wrote:
> >
> > But as I said, I only have basic infrastructure and am currently looking at
> > what to write tests for and how exactly that test should work. The detection
> > of git vs. stgit branch (does not work for me)
>
> This sounds as a bug. Could you elaborate on that please ?
>
>
> BTW the test for a StGit repo is:
>
> isStGIT = run("stg branch", &stgCurBranch); // slow command
>
> in function Git::getRefs() , file git_startup.cpp
Yes, I've seen that command. But it returns true for me even when it's not
a stg branch :-(. I am not sure what the problem there is.
> > Well, I somehow managed -- except I am not sure I dealed with the windows
> > part correctly. What could be improved is maybe if you know how to signal
> > a dependency between two projects. I currently rely on the top-level makefile
> > always calling the subdirs in the order they are specified, but I fear
> > portable recursive make does not really offer any better solution, so qmake
> > can't really do that either.
> >
>
> Could the following help ?
>
> http://lists.trolltech.com/qt4-preview-feedback/2004-10/thread00174-0.html
Does help a bit. Thanks.
That is, confirms my suspicion that there is no really correct solution and
remembered me the ordered config option, that I noticed in the documentation
once, but wasn't able to find again when I actually wrote the .pro files.
Added the option and rewound the branch on repo.or.cz.
> > Note: I think I found a bug in qmake here -- when you run qmake at top level,
> > the makefile will call qmake in subdirectories to create makefiles there, but
> > the rule has no dependencies, so it will not remake the makefiles when the
> > .pro files change there.
> >
>
> I knew that. For my use I always delete Makefiles after modifying any
> of *.pro files, I'm sure it exists a better way but honestly I didn't
> investigate too much on this.
I don't think there's too much to investigate -- it looks like an obvious bug
;-). Unless it's caused by the MAKEFILE setting :-( (I'll have to remove it
and check)
> > Also I don't understand why you set 'MAKEFILE = qmake' in the src/src.pro --
> > it does not seem to be respected, at least when I call it through the
> > top-level qgit.pro (which I now have to when there are 3 subdirs).
> >
>
> >From http://doc.trolltech.com/4.0/qmake-variable-reference.html#makefile
>
> MAKEFILE
> This variable specifies the name of the Makefile which qmake should
> use when outputting the dependency information for building a project.
> The value of this variable is typically handled by qmake or qmake.conf
> and rarely needs to be modified.
>
> I annotated the src.pro file and I found that line belongs from the
> very first version of src.pro, possibly copied from the Qt examples,
> so it smells you are right and we could remove that.
Looks like that. Funny thing is, that normally the makefiles are called
Makefile for me, not qmake, but I did see the qmake files (IIRC when I ran
qmake -recursive). That would mean it takes the value from the top-level .pro
and ignores it in the subdirs.
Regards,
Jan
--
Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-18 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-08 21:13 [QGIT RFC] Unit tests for QGit Jan Hudec
2008-08-08 23:00 ` Benjamin Sergeant
2008-08-10 7:55 ` Jan Hudec
2008-08-17 8:57 ` Marco Costalba
2008-08-17 14:15 ` Jan Hudec
2008-08-17 15:46 ` Marco Costalba
2008-08-17 19:58 ` Jan Hudec
2008-08-17 20:30 ` Marco Costalba
2008-08-18 18:00 ` Jan Hudec [this message]
2008-08-19 14:53 ` Marco Costalba
2008-08-27 20:18 ` Jan Hudec
2008-08-28 11:29 ` Marco Costalba
2008-08-28 15:31 ` Karl Hasselström
2008-08-28 18:54 ` Marco Costalba
2008-08-28 22:01 ` Jan Hudec
2008-08-29 7:01 ` Marco Costalba
2008-08-28 22:18 ` Karl Hasselström
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080818180048.GA15520@efreet.light.src \
--to=bulb@ucw.cz \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcostalba@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).