From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Bug/problem with 1.6.0 on UnixWare Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:45:22 -0400 Message-ID: <20080821204522.GA29361@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20080821130816.GB22453@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Boyd Lynn Gerber , Git List , Junio C Hamano To: Mike Ralphson X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Aug 21 22:47:03 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KWH3E-0006eo-CT for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:46:36 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753171AbYHUUpZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:45:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753090AbYHUUpZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:45:25 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:2943 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752762AbYHUUpZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:45:25 -0400 Received: (qmail 9523 invoked by uid 111); 21 Aug 2008 20:45:23 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with SMTP; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:45:23 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:45:22 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 03:38:32PM +0100, Mike Ralphson wrote: > Great stuff. Though I think it might provoke some patches to improve > the display of multiple long tag names for the same commit in gitweb! Heh. Can you pass along the final version of your build script? I want to make sure we are doing the same things. > Granted, but Junio seems to do releases at the weekend, and sometimes > they aren't the same content as the previous rc. Though I build and > test 7 days a week, I'd rarely look at the test results over the > weekend. And I was on vacation when the last minute AIX breakage went > into 1.5.6 - not that I would necessarily have been able to fix that > one. Yes, in theory, last minute code changes could cause a portability breakage. However, any changes from the last -rc to the release version tend to be extremely conservative (as judged by Junio), so in practice I don't think it happens. For example, I think this git-shell bug made it into master over a month before release. -Peff