From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 09:15:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080823071552.GU23334@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m37ia8sv49.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
> $ git remote update
> $ git reset --hard origin/master # when on master
>
> BTW. it is stated countless time in documentation that published
> history should be not rebased, barring some extenuating circumstances
Yes and people countless times ignore that recommendation and do
it anyways (for good reasons). And then other users
have to deal with these rebased trees somehow.
Anyways it is all solvable but right now ill supported
in standard commands and the documentation does not really
cover it. I was just asking (mostly for others to avoid
going through the same pain as me) for that to be improved
so that git becomes easier to use.
Sadly you guys don't even seem to want to recognize there
is a problem :-(
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-23 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-22 17:46 nicer frontend to get rebased tree? Andi Kleen
2008-08-22 17:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-22 18:27 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-22 19:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-22 20:11 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2008-08-22 20:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-22 20:36 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-08-22 20:46 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2008-08-22 20:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-22 21:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-23 7:10 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-23 9:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-08-23 16:36 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-23 23:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2008-08-23 15:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-23 16:45 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-23 17:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-25 9:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-23 18:18 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-08-23 18:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-23 20:08 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-08-23 21:38 ` Documentating branches (was: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?) Marius Vollmer
2008-08-23 22:17 ` Miklos Vajna
2008-08-23 22:30 ` Documenting branches Marius Vollmer
2008-08-23 22:18 ` Documentating branches Marius Vollmer
2008-08-22 17:56 ` nicer frontend to get rebased tree? Avery Pennarun
2008-08-22 18:31 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-22 19:03 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2008-08-22 19:34 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-08-23 7:15 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-08-23 8:52 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2008-08-23 9:21 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-08-23 16:53 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-23 21:04 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2008-08-23 21:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-23 22:09 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2008-08-23 22:13 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-08-24 0:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-23 22:49 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-08-23 23:01 ` Theodore Tso
2008-08-23 23:01 ` A proposed solution (Was: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?) Theodore Tso
2008-08-22 20:11 ` nicer frontend to get rebased tree? Mikael Magnusson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080823071552.GU23334@one.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=apenwarr@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).