From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC v3] Git User's Survey 2008
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 00:08:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200808260008.28958.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200807230325.04184.jnareb@gmail.com>
This is third (and hopefully last) revision of proposed questions
and announcement for Git User's Survey 2008.
First, it was decided that it would be web based survey. I would use
Survs.com (new, in beta); it is unlikely to change as all questions
are entered there already and moving it would require quite a bit of
work. It was recommended here on the list (I have received courtesy
invitation; thanks a lot); I have chosen it over survey.net.nz, used for
preceding 2006 (by Paolo Ciarrocchi) and 2007 (by me) surveys, because
it has some nice features, and allows export of results to CSV format
for further analysis.
Note that new features like "matrix" questions and ability to have
'other' selection for single choice and multiple choice questions
affect a bit form of this survey. This also affect chance to move
survey to different web survey site.
There are good news and bad news about choosing Survs.com. Good news is
that there would be no problem of free Survs beta account expiring
during running survey, or during analysis. Bad news is that submitting
survey currently requires having JavaScript enabled, which was pointed
out by Stephan Beyer; they are working on it, but I don't know if this
issue would be corrected in time for planned duration of Git User's
Survey 2008.
Second, what possible answers in the case of single answer and multiple
answer questions should be? You can view current version of survey at
provided survey link (see below), currently test one only. Please
point typos, mistakes and errors; I am not native English speaker.
Third, where to send survey to / where to publish information about the
survey? Last year the announcement was send to git mailing list, to
LKML (Linux kernel mailing list), and mailing list for git projects
found on GitProjects page on GIT wiki. Now that the number of projects
using Git as version control system has grown, I don't think it would
be good idea to "spam" all those mailing list; and if we don't send
notice to all other projects I'm not sure if we should include LKML.
Last year survey announcement was put on Git Homepage (thanks Pasky),
and on front page of Git Wiki; info about survey was also put on two
git hosting sites: kernel.org and repo.or.cz. It would be nice if it
was possible to put announcement about Git User's Survey 2008 at front
pages of other Git hosting sites, like GitHub (one of most popular, I
think), Gitorious, Freedesktop.org. If you know some other popular Git
hosting sites, and even better if you know who to contact about putting
survey announcement, please write. Is there some channel that I have
forgot about? Should info/announcement about Git User's Survey 2008 be
sent also to one of on-line magazines like LinuxToday or LWN, or asked
to put on some blog? I'll add it as journal entry for #git on Ohloh,
and try to make it so it would appear in "News" section for Ohloh
project page for Git: http://www.ohloh.net/projects/git.
Survs.com has nice feature of "channels", which allow to count
responses sent via different means separately; I am using it to
publish URL for 'test' channel - answers from this channel won't be
counted AT ALL!!!
I am thinking about asking to put annoncement about Git User's
Survey 2008 at the following places (in parenthesis there are people who
I think can ask to put announcement about survey):
* git.or.cz, Git Homepage (Petr 'Pasky' Baudis)
* git-scm.com, alternate Git Homepage (Scott Chacon)
* http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/FrontPage (it is wiki, after all)
* #git channel subject (one of channel admins, but who?)
* git.kernel.org (John 'Warthog9' Hawley)
* repo.or.cz (Petr 'Pasky' Baudis)
* gitorious.org (???)
* github.com (???)
* ...
What are other git hosting sites, or blogs, or other sites where to ask
to put announcement about this survey?
Fourth, how long should the survey last? When sending announcement we
should say where notice about Git User's Survey 2008 should be taken
down. Last year the survey was meant to take three weeks, but was up
longer. I'm thinking about having it last a month, or a month and a
half, starting from September 1.
Below there is second version of announcement email (I should probably
come up also with boilerplate announcement for web pages). I haven't
put third version of this year round of questions, because text of
survey at Survs.com and what I had written diverged, I'm sorry...
----
Hello all,
We would like to ask you a few questions about your use of the Git
version control system. This survey is mainly to understand who is
using Git, how and why.
The results will be published to the Git wiki and discussed on the git
mailing list.
We'll close the survey in 1 month starting from today, 1 September.
Please devote a few minutes of your time to fill this simple
questionnaire, it will help a lot the git community to understand your
needs, what you like of git, and of course what you don't like of it.
The survey can be found here:
http://www.survs.com/survey?id=M3PIVU72&channel=9XYYGHJ77G
(this is temporary channel URL; responses to this URL would
be, I guess, discarded).
----
You can view survey results (only summary, not individual responses)
at http://www.survs.com/shareResults?survey=M3PIVU72&rndm=OKJQ45LAG8
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-25 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 93+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-23 1:25 [RFC] Git User's Survey 2008 Jakub Narebski
2008-07-23 4:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-23 7:47 ` HP-UX issues (WAS: Re: [RFC] Git User's Survey 2008) Miklos Vajna
2008-07-23 21:38 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-23 23:45 ` Miklos Vajna
2008-07-23 11:06 ` [RFC] Git User's Survey 2008 Jakub Narebski
2008-07-24 11:46 ` Marek Zawirski
2008-07-24 12:09 ` Mailing lists, was " Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-25 17:23 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-07-25 18:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-25 21:52 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-25 21:57 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-07-25 22:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-25 22:13 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-07-26 10:54 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-26 12:19 ` Marek Zawirski
2008-07-26 21:50 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-07-26 21:52 ` Jean-François Veillette
2008-07-25 22:15 ` Petr Baudis
2008-07-26 15:51 ` Jing Xue
2008-07-26 16:47 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-26 17:51 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-07-26 18:17 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-26 19:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-26 18:38 ` Scott Chacon
2008-07-24 14:07 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-23 9:53 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-23 13:08 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-23 13:18 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-23 14:54 ` Robin Rosenberg
2008-07-23 16:00 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-24 10:44 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-23 23:30 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-23 23:33 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-23 23:53 ` Stephan Beyer
2008-07-24 5:02 ` david
2008-07-24 8:57 ` Stephan Beyer
2008-07-24 10:37 ` david
2008-07-24 9:52 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-26 15:34 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-27 11:24 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-07-23 16:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-24 0:10 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-23 14:54 ` Dmitry Potapov
2008-07-23 16:02 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-23 17:01 ` Stephan Beyer
2008-07-24 8:24 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-23 17:17 ` Alex Riesen
2008-07-24 8:15 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-23 14:12 ` Stephan Beyer
2008-07-24 22:22 ` Stephan Beyer
2008-07-23 14:38 ` Dmitry Potapov
2008-07-23 15:43 ` Matthias Kestenholz
2008-07-23 20:09 ` Dmitry Potapov
2008-07-23 21:49 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-24 18:08 ` Dmitry Potapov
2008-07-24 21:06 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-23 21:44 ` Petr Baudis
2008-07-23 21:59 ` Jakub Narebski
[not found] ` <169F15EC-1A58-4C2A-84FC-3D14F7B4F1C5@yahoo.ca>
2008-07-23 22:46 ` Miguel Arroz
2008-07-23 23:49 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-24 10:11 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2008-07-24 14:45 ` Jon Loeliger
2008-07-24 18:18 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-24 18:50 ` Lachele Foley (Lists)
2008-07-24 21:08 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-24 17:57 ` Dmitry Potapov
2008-07-24 18:42 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-07-31 12:48 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-08-20 1:08 ` [RFC v2] " Jakub Narebski
2008-08-20 11:34 ` Alex Riesen
2008-08-20 12:04 ` Petr Baudis
2008-08-20 13:50 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-08-20 18:18 ` Alex Riesen
2008-08-20 20:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-21 1:30 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-08-21 3:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-08-21 11:19 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-08-20 21:18 ` Stephan Beyer
2008-08-20 21:26 ` Stephan Beyer
2008-08-21 11:11 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-08-21 21:26 ` Stephan Beyer
2008-08-22 0:06 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-08-21 3:22 ` Mike Gant
2008-08-24 21:36 ` Stephan Beyer
2008-08-25 0:41 ` Jakub Narebski
[not found] ` <20080825012653.GB28160@leksak.fem-net>
2008-08-25 1:56 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-08-20 7:31 ` Abhijit Bhopatkar
2008-08-25 22:08 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2008-08-28 0:28 ` [RFC v3] " Stephan Beyer
2008-08-30 1:33 ` [RFC v4] Git User's Survey 2008 (cover letters) Jakub Narebski
2008-08-30 19:00 ` Garry Dolley
2008-09-01 7:47 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200808260008.28958.jnareb@gmail.com \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).