From: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
To: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] 'git svn info' fixes
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:03:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080830010319.GA2940@untitled> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1220017369-32637-1-git-send-email-trast@student.ethz.ch>
Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> wrote:
> Eric Wong wrote.
> > > So should we just change all "unknown foo" tests to verify that 'git
> > > svn info' errors out too?
> >
> > Yes, I see no reason to differ from plain svn here.
>
> This starts getting more complicated at every turn. The included
> mini-series (probably textually depends on the other 6 patches though)
> "fixes" this.
>
> HOWEVER: Subversion itself broke compatibility here. In 1.4:
>
> $ svn info new; echo $?
> new: (Not a versioned resource)
>
> 0
>
> Note the extra linebreak and successful exit. Current git-svn
> precisely matches this output. In 1.5, it's different:
>
> $ svn info new; echo $?
> svn: 'new' is not under version control
> 1
>
> While it is of course up to you what you would like to do (and modulo
> test_must_fail, 2/2 can still be used to fix the tests if you decide
> to reject 1/2), I suggest changing to 1.5 behaviour. exit(1) is the
> sane thing to do in this case, and that is already breaking
> bit-for-bit compatibility with SVN 1.4, so we might as well adopt the
> new error message. Of course this prevents us from comparing the
> output literally in the tests, so I settled for a slightly weaker
> check: failure status and mention of the filename.
Yes. Please maintain compatibility with svn 1.5. The current version
of git-svn should strive to maintain compatibility with the current
version of svn whenever possible.
> Unfortunately this does raise the question whether the URL-encoding
> issue treated in the other series is in fact a similar incompatibility
> between 1.4 and 1.5, not a (minor but long-standing) bug in git-svn.
It should match svn 1.5 for "git svn info".
Since "git svn info --url" is a git-svn-only thing, whatever makes the
most sense from a command-line scripting perspective (I don't have time
to check against a real repo right now):
For git-svn info --url, just want things like:
svn log -v `git svn info --url`
svn cp `git svn info --url` \
`git svn info --url | sed -e 's,/trunk,/tags/1.0,'`
svn rm `git svn info --url`
to just work.
I seem to recall the rules being slightly different for http(s):// and
(file://|svn://) URLs with the command-line client; but my memory may
just be fuzzy...
Thanks for looking into this!
--
Eric Wong
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-30 1:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-26 19:32 [PATCH 0/6] 'git svn info' fixes Thomas Rast
2008-08-26 19:32 ` [PATCH 1/6] git svn info: tests: let 'init' test run with SVN 1.5 Thomas Rast
2008-08-26 19:32 ` [PATCH 2/6] git svn info: tests: do not use set -e Thomas Rast
2008-08-26 19:32 ` [PATCH 3/6] git svn info: tests: use test_cmp instead of git-diff Thomas Rast
2008-08-26 19:32 ` [PATCH 4/6] git svn info: tests: fix ptouch argument order in setup Thomas Rast
2008-08-26 19:32 ` [PATCH 5/6] git svn info: make info relative to the current directory Thomas Rast
2008-08-26 19:32 ` [PATCH 6/6] git svn info: always quote URLs in 'info' output Thomas Rast
2008-08-27 9:43 ` Eric Wong
2008-08-27 9:53 ` [PATCH 0/6] 'git svn info' fixes Eric Wong
2008-08-28 8:30 ` Thomas Rast
2008-08-29 8:16 ` Eric Wong
2008-08-29 13:42 ` [PATCH 0/2] *** SUBJECT HERE *** Thomas Rast
2008-08-29 13:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] git-svn: match SVN 1.5 behaviour of info' on unknown item Thomas Rast
2008-08-29 13:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] git-svn: fix 'info' tests for unknown items Thomas Rast
2008-08-30 1:03 ` Eric Wong [this message]
2008-09-01 9:46 ` [PATCH 0/2] 'git svn info' fixes Thomas Rast
2008-09-01 22:58 ` Eric Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080830010319.GA2940@untitled \
--to=normalperson@yhbt.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=trast@student.ethz.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).