From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Baudis Subject: Re: pack count on repo.or.cz [was "Medium term dreams"] Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 15:08:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20080902130801.GN10360@machine.or.cz> References: <7vsksjsbcc.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080902000037.GA11869@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20080902010410.GI10360@machine.or.cz> <20080902011433.GA12682@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20080902111531.GL10360@machine.or.cz> <20080902115424.GA11303@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Sep 02 15:09:16 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KaVdD-0008F2-EA for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:09:15 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751223AbYIBNIK (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Sep 2008 09:08:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751152AbYIBNII (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Sep 2008 09:08:08 -0400 Received: from w241.dkm.cz ([62.24.88.241]:39236 "EHLO machine.or.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751096AbYIBNIH (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Sep 2008 09:08:07 -0400 Received: by machine.or.cz (Postfix, from userid 2001) id 9BC1C3939B36; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 15:08:01 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080902115424.GA11303@coredump.intra.peff.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 07:54:24AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > So did you check for loose objects? That is what you should get if there > were any objects that would have been lost. If there aren't any new > loose objects, then there were no objects that would be lost. Before: rover:/srv/git/git.git# l objects~/??/* | wc -l 3343 rover:/srv/git/git.git# l objects~/pack/* | wc -l 750 After: rover:/srv/git/git.git# l objects/??/* | wc -l 2920 rover:/srv/git/git.git# l objects/pack/* | wc -l 590 > As to why the other packs weren't pruned, I don't know. In my example, > you can see that the pruning happens as we expect. So either there is a > bug in git-prune-packed, or there is something we're not realizing. Well, that's my question here. :-) If you're still interested in looking into this further, you can wget -r or rsync over the git.git repository from repo.or.cz. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis The next generation of interesting software will be done on the Macintosh, not the IBM PC. -- Bill Gates