From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Baudis Subject: Re: pack count on repo.or.cz [was "Medium term dreams"] Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 12:08:28 +0200 Message-ID: <20080903100828.GS10360@machine.or.cz> References: <7vsksjsbcc.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080902000037.GA11869@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20080902010410.GI10360@machine.or.cz> <20080902011433.GA12682@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20080902111531.GL10360@machine.or.cz> <20080902115424.GA11303@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20080902130801.GN10360@machine.or.cz> <48BD446C.6020403@viscovery.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeff King , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Sixt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Sep 03 12:09:43 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KapIz-0003gZ-O0 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:09:42 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751677AbYICKIg (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2008 06:08:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751783AbYICKIg (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2008 06:08:36 -0400 Received: from w241.dkm.cz ([62.24.88.241]:50304 "EHLO machine.or.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751664AbYICKIf (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2008 06:08:35 -0400 Received: by machine.or.cz (Postfix, from userid 2001) id 4D3413939B4B; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 12:08:28 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48BD446C.6020403@viscovery.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 03:49:32PM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote: > Petr Baudis schrieb: > >> As to why the other packs weren't pruned, I don't know. In my example, > >> you can see that the pruning happens as we expect. So either there is a > >> bug in git-prune-packed, or there is something we're not realizing. > > > > Well, that's my question here. :-) > > Does removing all the *.keep files help? ;) Haha, good catch - thanks! :-) I wonder where they came from, though I hazily remember some curious behaviour of older Git versions wrt. .keep files and they seem all to be of old date. Now I have a single nice pack and fsck of all the forks still passes fine. Thanks all, I will adopt this for all projects. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis The next generation of interesting software will be done on the Macintosh, not the IBM PC. -- Bill Gates