From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miklos Vajna Subject: Re: blame vs annotate? Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 19:49:39 +0200 Message-ID: <20080903174939.GH16514@genesis.frugalware.org> References: <57518fd10809030943i35af222fw82cf591c737b8c04@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8i0lXXx49qphuFT" Cc: Git Mailing List To: Jonathan del Strother X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Sep 03 19:51:48 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KawVG-0001xY-7g for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:50:50 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758840AbYICRto (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2008 13:49:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758835AbYICRtn (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2008 13:49:43 -0400 Received: from virgo.iok.hu ([193.202.89.103]:55170 "EHLO virgo.iok.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758830AbYICRtl (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Sep 2008 13:49:41 -0400 Received: from kag.elte.hu (kag.elte.hu [157.181.177.1]) by virgo.iok.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF321B251A; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 19:49:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from genesis.frugalware.org (frugalware.elte.hu [157.181.177.34]) by kag.elte.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7BE44465E; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 19:49:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: by genesis.frugalware.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 99A6E1190009; Wed, 3 Sep 2008 19:49:39 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <57518fd10809030943i35af222fw82cf591c737b8c04@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --a8i0lXXx49qphuFT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 05:43:03PM +0100, Jonathan del Strother wrote: > What's the difference between 'git blame' & 'git annotate'? The > output is practically identical - it's not obvious when you would use > one over the other 'git annoate' is the same as 'git blame -c'. --a8i0lXXx49qphuFT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAki+zjMACgkQe81tAgORUJY5OwCdH2IGtFloCri6sEG0UU4a5fz7 ll8An072e0ppOSgCUPfn2U5y3v52KxP2 =zPbf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a8i0lXXx49qphuFT--