git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>
To: David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com>
Cc: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 00:17:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080905221731.GI15520@efreet.light.src> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <402731c90809031943n181ad6fbw366f90e80aaca2a@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 19:43:20 -0700, David Aguilar wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 9:25 AM, Felipe Contreras
> <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 6:20 PM, H.Merijn Brand <h.m.brand@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 07:45:52 -0700, "Shawn O. Pearce"
> >> <spearce@spearce.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > This is partial summary of Git User's Survey 2008 [...]
> >>> >
> >>> > 03. With which programming languages are you proficient?
> >>> >
> >>> > Around 939 people answered this question.  C is most popular with 59%;
> >>> > Ruby and surprisingly a bit shell script programming have around second
> >>> > place, with about 52-53%.  More people are proficient with Python than
> >>> > in Perl by about 1/3-1/4.  Very few people (25 responses, around 3%)
> >>> > feel proficient in Tcl/Tk, which means shallow pool of possible git-gui
> >>> > and gitk contributors.
> >>
> >> Rewrite them in perl or python and get more patches?
> >> The fact that it is not perl withheld me from finding solutions to
> >> problems I still have with the git-gui gitk combination
> >
> > Ruby!
> >
> > --
> > Felipe Contreras
> 
> There's already a python git-gui:
>     http://cola.tuxfamily.org/
> 
> PyQt is a very mature library, which is one of the primary reasons I
> chose Python.

Sorry, but I disagree. Tried PyQt, been hugely disapointed. Boils down to any
thing that can make Python (or, for that matter, any) interpreter segfault
being totally broken.

But as far as Qt goes, I would really just stick with C++. Python or Ruby
have some advantage, but I am not sure it's that big to offset the fact, that
a lot of code already exists in QGit.

> Does Ruby have any good and mature UI libraries?  I know it's all the
> rage for web stuff, but I haven't heard too much about people using it
> for GUIs.

Qt? I believe Ruby Qt bindings are in better shape (properly handle Qt
deleting objects under Ruby's hands).

-- 
						 Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-05 22:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-03 14:07 Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary Jakub Narebski
2008-09-03 14:45 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-09-03 15:20   ` H.Merijn Brand
2008-09-03 16:25     ` Felipe Contreras
2008-09-04  2:43       ` David Aguilar
2008-09-05 22:17         ` Jan Hudec [this message]
2008-09-06  4:17           ` David Aguilar
2008-09-03 15:00 ` David Brown
2008-09-03 15:41 ` Scott Chacon
2008-09-03 16:00   ` Jakub Narebski
2008-09-04 13:23 ` Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary, part 2 Jakub Narebski
2008-09-06  2:22 ` Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary, part 3 Jakub Narebski
2008-09-06  5:15   ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-09-06  8:27     ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-09-07 23:07     ` Jonas Fonseca
2008-09-07 23:47       ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-09-06 22:17 ` Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary, part 4 - how do we use Git Jakub Narebski
2008-09-07  8:31   ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-09-07  8:44     ` Jakub Narebski
2008-09-11 20:14 ` Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary, part 5 - other SCM Jakub Narebski
2008-09-11 21:03   ` Anatol Pomozov
     [not found]     ` <48C98F92.40903@workspacewhiz.com>
2008-09-11 22:05       ` Jakub Narebski
2008-09-11 21:54   ` Jeff King
2008-09-11 22:51   ` david
2008-09-12 10:44     ` Jakub Narebski
2008-09-13 21:11       ` david
2008-09-13 22:03         ` Jakub Narebski
2008-09-15 11:51       ` Mark Brown
2008-09-14 10:45   ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-09-14 13:32     ` Jakub Narebski
2008-09-15  3:39     ` david
2008-09-15  7:00       ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-09-16 17:12       ` Jakub Narebski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080905221731.GI15520@efreet.light.src \
    --to=bulb@ucw.cz \
    --cc=davvid@gmail.com \
    --cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).