git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary, part 3
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 04:22:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200809060422.34779.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200809031607.19722.jnareb@gmail.com>

This is partial summary of Git User's Survey 2008 after more that 2000 
(yes, that is more than _two thousands_ responses) just after the 5 days
of running the survey.  It is based on "Analysis" page for this survey:
  http://www.survs.com/shareResults?survey=M3PIVU72&rndm=OKJQ45LAG8

We have around 2040 individual responses (excluding 21 responses in the 
'testing' channel), as compared to 683 individual responses for 2007 
survey, and (I think) 115 answers (Base = 115) for 2006 survey. 
That is quite a lot, especially after only five days (or so) since 
staring the survey.
 

Getting started with Git:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

05. Did you find Git easy to learn?

Replies look like nice gaussian-like distribution, centered around the 
middle, but with slight bias towards 'easy' part, with 16% hard vs 24% 
easy, and 2% very hard vs 6% very easy.

The 2% (33) for 'very hard' can be a bit of a concern...


09. How long do you use Git?

Majority of people use Git for about from 3 months to 1 year (29% for 
3-6 months, 26% for 6-12 months). The graph is centered around this 
values, too. Few people (58, 3%) said that they use Git more than two 
years, fewer still (41, 2%) stated that they use it from the very 
beginning.

This hopefully means that most people had contact with git after it had 
improved its UI.


10. Rate your own proficiency with Git

Here again the distribution is almost perfectly symmetric.  Most people 
say that they are proficient with Git enough for everyday use (44%), 
slightly more (23%) can offer advice than selected 'casual, needs 
advice', while slightly more (7%) thinks themself novices than people 
who think that know Git very well (4%).

For this survey it seems to imply that results would not be biased 
(scewed) by people who know Git well to very well.


11. Does git.git repository include code produced by you?

154 says yes, 1674 says no, 227 skipped this question.

It is not just git developers that answer this question... which is kind 
of obvious because we do not have that many developers (I wish).


How do you use Git:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

18. What operating system do you use Git on? (multiple answers)

This question was made multiple choices (one can use Git on different 
operating systems; either multi-boot, or multiple machines), as 
compared to free-form question in 2006 and 2007 survey.

Linux (or should we say GNU/Linux?) dominates with 82%, second is
MacOS X (Darwin) with 59%, and MS Windows is only third with 25%
(here msysGit is more popular with 15% than Cygwin with 10%).
If we consider fact that MS Windows dominates desktop, one can see that 
Git is not very popular choice for Windows machines, probably because 
of perceived and real shortcomings when trying to run it on non-POSIX 
operating system.  The domination of Linux is not strange considering 
fact that Git was created for the purpose of being distributed version 
control system for Linux kernel, and is designed around Linux features 
(fast fork, fast stat, prototyping using scripts, etc.).

Among 'other' operating systems there is iPhone, iPod, 
MS Windows/AndLinux,... but also for example Ubuntu or Debian Sarge,
which clearly should be marked as Linux instead.


19. What hardware platforms do you use Git on? (multiple answers)

Here slightly more people (88%) use 32-bit machines than 64-bit machines 
(61%)... if we can say that, as it is multiple choice question.  Few 
people chose 'portable/handheld' (51, 3%), fewer still selected 
'other' (8 replies). 

Here 'other' I think mean: I don't know which option to chose.  There is 
one OLPC-XO, but also PowerPC and PPC/G4.


20. What editor, IDE or RAD you use working with Git?

Currently Vim, with 48% or 841 responses, wins by narrow margin over 
TextMate which has 44% (782 responses).  Curious.

Emacs is third with 18%, followed closely by Eclipse with 13%.  More 
than 50 replies (responses) also have NetBeans IDE, XCode, MS Visual 
Studio and Notepad++.

Among 'other (please specify)' we have nano, Kate, Gedit, Geany, 
e-Editor (aka. TextMate for Windows) or just e, jEdit, SlickEdit, 
SharpDevelop, SciTE, Code::Blocks, joe, ActiveState Komodo, Aptana and 
a few others; even one 'ed' ;-)

Note that quite a few people wrote about integration with IDE/editor in 
the "35. What tools (or kind of tools) would you like to see Git 
support in?" question.

To be continued...

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-09-06  2:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-03 14:07 Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary Jakub Narebski
2008-09-03 14:45 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-09-03 15:20   ` H.Merijn Brand
2008-09-03 16:25     ` Felipe Contreras
2008-09-04  2:43       ` David Aguilar
2008-09-05 22:17         ` Jan Hudec
2008-09-06  4:17           ` David Aguilar
2008-09-03 15:00 ` David Brown
2008-09-03 15:41 ` Scott Chacon
2008-09-03 16:00   ` Jakub Narebski
2008-09-04 13:23 ` Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary, part 2 Jakub Narebski
2008-09-06  2:22 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2008-09-06  5:15   ` Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary, part 3 Shawn O. Pearce
2008-09-06  8:27     ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-09-07 23:07     ` Jonas Fonseca
2008-09-07 23:47       ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-09-06 22:17 ` Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary, part 4 - how do we use Git Jakub Narebski
2008-09-07  8:31   ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-09-07  8:44     ` Jakub Narebski
2008-09-11 20:14 ` Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary, part 5 - other SCM Jakub Narebski
2008-09-11 21:03   ` Anatol Pomozov
     [not found]     ` <48C98F92.40903@workspacewhiz.com>
2008-09-11 22:05       ` Jakub Narebski
2008-09-11 21:54   ` Jeff King
2008-09-11 22:51   ` david
2008-09-12 10:44     ` Jakub Narebski
2008-09-13 21:11       ` david
2008-09-13 22:03         ` Jakub Narebski
2008-09-15 11:51       ` Mark Brown
2008-09-14 10:45   ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-09-14 13:32     ` Jakub Narebski
2008-09-15  3:39     ` david
2008-09-15  7:00       ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-09-16 17:12       ` Jakub Narebski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200809060422.34779.jnareb@gmail.com \
    --to=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).