From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: git apply vs. renamed files index mismatch (was: Re: [PATCH 1/4] POWERPC: Rename dma_64.c to dma.c) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 23:58:33 +0200 Message-ID: <20080908215833.GC1175@lst.de> References: <1220900995-11928-1-git-send-email-becky.bruce@freescale.com> <1220900995-11928-2-git-send-email-becky.bruce@freescale.com> <48C57A92.6060608@freescale.com> <20080908212717.GA21338@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Scott Wood , git@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org To: Anton Vorontsov X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Sep 08 23:59:59 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kcom6-00052s-HW for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:59:59 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753540AbYIHV6w (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2008 17:58:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753250AbYIHV6w (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2008 17:58:52 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:54987 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752171AbYIHV6v (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2008 17:58:51 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by verein.lst.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id m88LwYIF001567 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 8 Sep 2008 23:58:34 +0200 Received: (from hch@localhost) by verein.lst.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id m88LwXlR001564; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 23:58:33 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080908212717.GA21338@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Spam-Score: -0.001 () BAYES_44 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 01:27:17AM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > I always thought that posting "-M" patches to the public lists is > discouraged since it is quite difficult to apply them via patch(1). > Also think of non-git users... Yes, it's a horrible idea.