From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary, part 5 - other SCM Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:54:29 -0400 Message-ID: <20080911215429.GC3187@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <200809031607.19722.jnareb@gmail.com> <200809112214.18366.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Sep 11 23:55:41 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kdu8Y-0003vC-Vq for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 23:55:39 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753081AbYIKVyb (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:54:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753053AbYIKVyb (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:54:31 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:1334 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752926AbYIKVyb (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:54:31 -0400 Received: (qmail 6042 invoked by uid 111); 11 Sep 2008 21:54:30 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with SMTP; Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:54:30 -0400 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:54:29 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200809112214.18366.jnareb@gmail.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:14:17PM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote: > SCM | Never | Used it | Still use > -------------------------------------------------------------- [...] > CVS | 12% (242) | 62% (1277) | 13% (260) 1 I like to think of this as 1017 monitors that we have saved from getting punched in frustration. > 25) How do you publish/propagate your changes? > (Choice - Multiple answers) > > ====================================== > method | using it > -------------------------------------- > push | 91% (1740) Obviously a quite popular choice. I wonder if this could be broken down more in next year's survey: - push into my public repo, interested people pull - push into central repo -Peff