git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk>
To: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>
Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>,
	git@vger.kernel.org,
	Imran M Yousuf <imyousuf@smartitengineering.com>
Subject: Re: [JGIT PATCH 1/2] Issue 23: Resolve tag^0 as tag^{commit}
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 02:00:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080912000007.GA31931@diku.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200809120047.58484.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>

Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> wrote Fri, Sep 12, 2008:
> torsdagen den 11 september 2008 23.39.27 skrev Jonas Fonseca:
> > Repository.resolve("tag^0") failed with "not a commit". Fix it and add a
> > test case for it.
> 
> It seems this case is not *that* special. It is tag^N == tag^{commit}^N
> Same for tag~N == tag^{commit}~N-
 
git-rev-parse(1) says:

 · A suffix ^ to a revision parameter means the first parent of that
   commit object.  ^<n> means the <n>th parent (i.e.  rev^ is
   equivalent to rev^1). As a special rule, rev^0 means the commit
   itself and is used when rev is the object name of a tag object that
   refers to a commit object.

but does take tag^1, however not tag^2. It looks like tag~N is broken in
JGit ("not a commit") so should also be fixed if we want to be
compatible with git-rev-parse.

BTW, I just noticed that ^{} is not handled correctly either for tags.

 · A suffix ^ followed by an empty brace pair (e.g.  v0.99.8^{}) means
   the object could be a tag, and dereference the tag recursively
   until a non-tag object is found.

Only one derefence is performed.

> My fault, i guess, but it would be nice of you fixed it while you are at it.

I will try to make fixes for the above cases tomorrow.

> Second, the testcase in the second patch fails on my machine.
> 
> testDerefTaggedTagTree(org.spearce.jgit.lib.T0008_testparserev)
> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<[269e1253bad5c247c6bde37aa48ae1e03138206c]> but was:<[be83157b4ffe650d728ba4f98ad47b623b0d0c20]>
> 	at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:81)
> 	at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:87)
> 	at org.spearce.jgit.lib.T0008_testparserev.testDerefTaggedTagTree(T0008_testparserev.java:123)

I reran all the test before formatting the patch, but after doing some
last minut changes. When I run all the tests using maven (inside
NetBeans or from the command line) it tells me:

	Tests run: 428, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

From the output it looks like the tests in the files named T000* are
never run. However, where the breakage is (could be my setup) I don't
know. Imran?

Anyway, for now I will just run the single test specifically. Perhaps I
should just put this into the same patch. Anyway, the following should
fix it.

diff --git a/org.spearce.jgit.test/tst/org/spearce/jgit/lib/T0008_testparserev.java b/org.spearce.jgit.test/tst/org/spearce/jgit/lib/T0008_testparserev.java
index 2a1a4ad..1fc73b4 100644
--- a/org.spearce.jgit.test/tst/org/spearce/jgit/lib/T0008_testparserev.java
+++ b/org.spearce.jgit.test/tst/org/spearce/jgit/lib/T0008_testparserev.java
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ public void testDerefTagIssue23() throws IOException {
 	}
 
 	public void testDerefTaggedTagTree() throws IOException {
-		assertEquals("269e1253bad5c247c6bde37aa48ae1e03138206c",db.resolve("refs/tags/C").name());
+		assertEquals("be83157b4ffe650d728ba4f98ad47b623b0d0c20",db.resolve("refs/tags/C").name());
 		assertEquals("d86a2aada2f5e7ccf6f11880bfb9ab404e8a8864",db.resolve("refs/tags/C^{commit}").name());
 		assertEquals("856ec208ae6cadac25a6d74f19b12bb27a24fe24",db.resolve("refs/tags/C^{tree}").name());
 	}

-- 
Jonas Fonseca

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-12  0:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-11 21:39 [JGIT PATCH 1/2] Issue 23: Resolve tag^0 as tag^{commit} Jonas Fonseca
2008-09-11 22:47 ` Robin Rosenberg
2008-09-12  0:00   ` Jonas Fonseca [this message]
2008-09-12  1:51     ` Imran M Yousuf
2008-09-12  8:40       ` [JGIT PATCH] Configure the maven surefire plugin to specifically include all tests Jonas Fonseca
2008-09-12 14:47         ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-09-12  6:47     ` [JGIT PATCH 1/2] Issue 23: Resolve tag^0 as tag^{commit} Robin Rosenberg
2008-09-12 10:57       ` [JGIT PATCH 1/3] Fix IncorrectObjectTypeException thrown for incorrect ^{blob} Jonas Fonseca
2008-09-12 10:57       ` [JGIT PATCH 2/3] Fix off by one distance during resolving of commit~N Jonas Fonseca
2008-09-12 10:57       ` [JGIT PATCH 3/3] Tests and fixes for dereferencing tags in Repository.resolve() Jonas Fonseca

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080912000007.GA31931@diku.dk \
    --to=fonseca@diku.dk \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=imyousuf@smartitengineering.com \
    --cc=robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com \
    --cc=spearce@spearce.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).