git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
Cc: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary, part 5 - other SCM
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:12:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200809161912.06571.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0809142038190.19489@asgard.lang.hm>

On Mon, 15 Sep 2008, David Lang <david@lang.hm> napisał:
> On Sun, 14 Sep 2008, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
>> On 9/12/08, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>  15) Do you miss features in git that you know from other SCMs?
>>>     If yes, what features are these (and from which SCM)?
>>>     (Open ended text - Essay)
>>>
>>>  Total respondents       1046 (some/many of them wrote 'no')
>>>  skipped this question   1249
>>>
>>>  This is just a very quick summary, based on a first few pages of
>>>  responses, Full analysis is I think best left for after closing the
>>>  survey, because I think this would be a lot of work...
>>>
>>>  So here is preliminary list, or rather beginning of one:
>>>   * sparse/partial checkout and clone (e.g. Perforce)
>>
>> Have not read the survey result, but do you recall what is the most
>> used term for sparse/partial checkout? What SCMs do sparse/partial
>> checkout? I think it could be usable as it is now in my
>> will-be-sent-again series, but I don't really know how people want it
>> to from that.
> 
> the most common use-case is people who want to follow a project but
> (at least think that they) don't need the history. so they want to
> save time/bandwideth/disk space by not downloading things they don't
> need. 

Errr... the idea is to implement partial (sparse, narrow) _checkout_,
which is doable, not partial/lazy _clone_, which is very, very 
difficult.

Partial checkout *might* help reduce disk space because usually 
repository database (which is compressed and deltaified) is smaller 
than checkout; and if it isn't you can always use _shallow_ clone (only 
part of history) and/or remote alternates (with reference repository
not on your quota, or on different filesystem).  And it might help
checkout/commit/diff/status times (performance) on slow filesystems, 
with extremely large number of files in full checkout.  But contrary to
centralized SCM, where server is usually net away from working area,
partial checkout doesn't affect network usage _at all_.

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-09-16 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-03 14:07 Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary Jakub Narebski
2008-09-03 14:45 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-09-03 15:20   ` H.Merijn Brand
2008-09-03 16:25     ` Felipe Contreras
2008-09-04  2:43       ` David Aguilar
2008-09-05 22:17         ` Jan Hudec
2008-09-06  4:17           ` David Aguilar
2008-09-03 15:00 ` David Brown
2008-09-03 15:41 ` Scott Chacon
2008-09-03 16:00   ` Jakub Narebski
2008-09-04 13:23 ` Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary, part 2 Jakub Narebski
2008-09-06  2:22 ` Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary, part 3 Jakub Narebski
2008-09-06  5:15   ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-09-06  8:27     ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-09-07 23:07     ` Jonas Fonseca
2008-09-07 23:47       ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-09-06 22:17 ` Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary, part 4 - how do we use Git Jakub Narebski
2008-09-07  8:31   ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-09-07  8:44     ` Jakub Narebski
2008-09-11 20:14 ` Git User's Survey 2008 partial summary, part 5 - other SCM Jakub Narebski
2008-09-11 21:03   ` Anatol Pomozov
     [not found]     ` <48C98F92.40903@workspacewhiz.com>
2008-09-11 22:05       ` Jakub Narebski
2008-09-11 21:54   ` Jeff King
2008-09-11 22:51   ` david
2008-09-12 10:44     ` Jakub Narebski
2008-09-13 21:11       ` david
2008-09-13 22:03         ` Jakub Narebski
2008-09-15 11:51       ` Mark Brown
2008-09-14 10:45   ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2008-09-14 13:32     ` Jakub Narebski
2008-09-15  3:39     ` david
2008-09-15  7:00       ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-09-16 17:12       ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-12 11:11 dhruva

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200809161912.06571.jnareb@gmail.com \
    --to=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@lang.hm \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).