From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Haberman Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Prepare for non-interactive merge-preserving rebase Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:22:11 -0500 Organization: Exigence Message-ID: <20080923162211.d4b15373.stephen@exigencecorp.com> References: <48D95836.6040200@op5.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Git Mailing List , Junio C Hamano To: Andreas Ericsson X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Sep 23 23:23:55 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KiFMH-0001Hw-6W for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:23:45 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755885AbYIWVW0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:22:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755886AbYIWVW0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:22:26 -0400 Received: from smtp172.sat.emailsrvr.com ([66.216.121.172]:43074 "EHLO smtp172.sat.emailsrvr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755715AbYIWVWZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:22:25 -0400 Received: from relay7.relay.sat.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay7.relay.sat.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id D18F05B05D6; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:22:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: by relay7.relay.sat.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: stephen-AT-exigencecorp.com) with ESMTP id 1F5803B3A37; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:22:18 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <48D95836.6040200@op5.se> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0beta3 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > Stephen, I had to modify the tests a bit to get them to work with how > I implemented the merge-preserving rebase, and also to remove a lot of > the cruft that was previously in there. Hope you're ok with the > attribution in the commit message. No problem, it looks great. This is awesome. Thanks for the insanely short turnaround. The GIT_EDITOR=: hack is neat. I did not think it would be that simple. - Stephen