From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miklos Vajna Subject: Re: having to pull twice Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:00:49 +0200 Message-ID: <20080929150049.GT23137@genesis.frugalware.org> References: <200809271616.32082.trast@student.ethz.ch> <20080928151135.GF23137@genesis.frugalware.org> <200809281726.23062.trast@student.ethz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JVTRtevMO87SusWP" Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" , "Michael P. Soulier" , git@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Rast X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Sep 29 17:02:45 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KkKG9-0001Y9-Df for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:02:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751172AbYI2PAv (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:00:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751482AbYI2PAv (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:00:51 -0400 Received: from virgo.iok.hu ([193.202.89.103]:60116 "EHLO virgo.iok.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750855AbYI2PAu (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:00:50 -0400 Received: from kag.elte.hu (kag.elte.hu [157.181.177.1]) by virgo.iok.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863B958134; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:00:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from genesis.frugalware.org (frugalware.elte.hu [157.181.177.34]) by kag.elte.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7284465E; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:00:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by genesis.frugalware.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 175E811901A1; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:00:49 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200809281726.23062.trast@student.ethz.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --JVTRtevMO87SusWP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 05:26:20PM +0200, Thomas Rast wrote: > IIUC, this is not the same as "racy git". The racy case is if you > manage to get a file changed immediately after its index entry was > updated, so that it will look unchanged. In this case, it's simply > the same file with a new mtime, which means it looks changed > superficially but still has the same contents. Right. I called it "racy" because it had something to do with timestamps. I guess we have no proper term for this kind of problem yet. ;-) --JVTRtevMO87SusWP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkjg7aEACgkQe81tAgORUJbNZQCeMw68kVF5Y628f3PEFn139vmV XEQAn3zfKuiSvh2YUbGFA8b8t9JYcbcd =G9qp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JVTRtevMO87SusWP--