From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] Builtin-commit: show on which branch a commit was added Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:44:30 -0400 Message-ID: <20080929224430.GA11545@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <4C04A26E-5829-4A39-AD89-F5A68E606AA3@ai.rug.nl> <1220634785-55543-1-git-send-email-pdebie@ai.rug.nl> <7vzlmkpltb.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080921104238.GA9217@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , Git Mailinglist To: Pieter de Bie X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Sep 30 00:45:48 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KkRUw-00028Z-2U for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:45:46 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752141AbYI2Woe (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:44:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751596AbYI2Woe (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:44:34 -0400 Received: from peff.net ([208.65.91.99]:1591 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751487AbYI2Woe (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:44:34 -0400 Received: (qmail 27593 invoked by uid 111); 29 Sep 2008 22:44:33 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:44:33 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:44:30 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:09:17PM +0200, Pieter de Bie wrote: > How about something like > > Created commit abcd1234 on widget -- "subwidget: one line summary" I think that is probably just trading one visual problem for another. That is, there are other people will have the same problem with "--" that I had with ": ". And of course it doesn't deal with the line length issues. Anyway, I seem to be the only one complaining, so perhaps it should just be left as-is. -Peff