From: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
To: Uwe Kleine-KKKnig <ukleinek@strlen.de>
Cc: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>,
Erez Zilber <erezzi.list@gmail.com>,
"git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
open-iscsi@googlegroups.com, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: enhance git describe --tags help
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:04:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080930190449.GG21310@spearce.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080930095641.GA9001@strlen.de>
Uwe Kleine-KKKnig <ukleinek@strlen.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 08:01:27AM -0700, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
> > --tags::
> > If a lightweight tag exactly matches, output it. If no
> > annotated tag is found in the ancestry but a lightweight
> > tag is found, output the lightweight tag.
>
> IMHO --tags should behave as Erez expected (because it's what I
> expected, too). As --tags currently behaves it's only usable in very
> rare cases (most of the time it only makes a difference on repos without
> any annotated tag).
>
> When do you pass --tags? Only if a lightweight tag is OK for an answer.
> And then I would prefer a "near" lightweight tag to a "farer" annotated
> one.
I don't disagree. I've been tempted to write a patch to change the
behavior of git-describe so that --tags and --all control what names
are inserted into the candidate list, but don't control the ordering
of their selection.
I think this is all that is needed to make the behavior do what you
and Erez expected. But its a pretty big change in the results if
you are passing in --all or --tags today.
--8<--
[WIP] Change meaning of --tags and --all
---
builtin-describe.c | 6 ++----
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin-describe.c b/builtin-describe.c
index ec404c8..fd54fec 100644
--- a/builtin-describe.c
+++ b/builtin-describe.c
@@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ static const char * const describe_usage[] = {
};
static int debug; /* Display lots of verbose info */
-static int all; /* Default to annotated tags only */
-static int tags; /* But allow any tags if --tags is specified */
+static int all; /* Any valid ref can be used */
+static int tags; /* Either lightweight or annotated tags */
static int longformat;
static int abbrev = DEFAULT_ABBREV;
static int max_candidates = 10;
@@ -112,8 +112,6 @@ static int compare_pt(const void *a_, const void *b_)
{
struct possible_tag *a = (struct possible_tag *)a_;
struct possible_tag *b = (struct possible_tag *)b_;
- if (a->name->prio != b->name->prio)
- return b->name->prio - a->name->prio;
if (a->depth != b->depth)
return a->depth - b->depth;
if (a->found_order != b->found_order)
--
1.6.0.2.513.g6dbd
--
Shawn.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-30 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-28 13:48 git-describe doesn't show the most recent tag Erez Zilber
2008-09-28 13:55 ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-09-28 14:29 ` Erez Zilber
2008-09-28 14:39 ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-09-28 15:03 ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-09-28 15:12 ` [PATCH] doc: enhance git describe --tags help Pierre Habouzit
2008-09-29 15:01 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-09-30 8:39 ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-10-10 16:59 ` [RFC PATCH] describe: Make --tags and --all match lightweight tags more often Shawn O. Pearce
2008-10-10 17:12 ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-10-10 18:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-10-13 14:32 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-10-13 14:39 ` [PATCH v2] " Shawn O. Pearce
2008-10-15 12:54 ` Santi Béjar
2008-10-11 22:47 ` [RFC PATCH] " Andreas Ericsson
2008-10-12 18:00 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-10-12 18:13 ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-10-12 18:29 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2008-09-30 9:56 ` [PATCH] doc: enhance git describe --tags help Uwe Kleine-König
2008-09-30 10:09 ` Andreas Ericsson
2008-09-30 19:04 ` Shawn O. Pearce [this message]
2008-09-30 22:14 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2008-09-30 22:26 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-10-15 20:05 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2008-09-28 15:05 ` git-describe doesn't show the most recent tag Erez Zilber
2008-09-28 14:51 ` Andreas Ericsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080930190449.GG21310@spearce.org \
--to=spearce@spearce.org \
--cc=erezzi.list@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=madcoder@debian.org \
--cc=open-iscsi@googlegroups.com \
--cc=ukleinek@strlen.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).