From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Haberman Subject: Re: interactive rebase not rebasing Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:13:21 -0500 Organization: Exigence Message-ID: <20081001121321.5761fc7e.stephen@exigencecorp.com> References: <20080928235013.5c749c6e.stephen@exigencecorp.com> <48E078BF.5030806@op5.se> <20081001010306.01cc34eb.stephen@exigencecorp.com> <48E32BD4.1050107@op5.se> <20081001095225.d28de16a.stephen@exigencecorp.com> <48E396AF.2000100@op5.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Andreas Ericsson X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 01 19:14:41 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kl5Hc-0004WU-0d for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 01 Oct 2008 19:14:40 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753391AbYJARN1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:13:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753357AbYJARN1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:13:27 -0400 Received: from smtp202.sat.emailsrvr.com ([66.216.121.202]:53569 "EHLO smtp202.sat.emailsrvr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751642AbYJARN0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:13:26 -0400 Received: from relay10.relay.sat.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay10.relay.sat.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A115811B388A; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:13:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: by relay10.relay.sat.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: stephen-AT-exigencecorp.com) with ESMTP id 3D32A11B234E; Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:13:24 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <48E396AF.2000100@op5.se> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0beta3 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > > I've attempted to do that. Now that I sent in the patch, if you could > > review it, I would appreciate your feedback. > > I'm heading home from work now. I'll look it over tonight or tomorrow > morning. Cool, thanks. Question: how taboo is it to just add another test file? I'm attempting to integrate my test into t3404, which is the existing interactive rebase test. The two test_expect_success's I added worked when I ran them at the start of the test and then reset --hard the branches back for the other tests, but if I paste my tests where they should probably be, in the middle after the other -p tests, they break because the 10 or tests before this have screwed with the DAG already. I can suffer through getting it to work, but a t3409 would be much easier, and probably easier to read as well as a I could setup my own DAG instead of hacking onto 3404s. > Thanks for the confidence :-) No problem. :-) - Stephen